By registering with our site you will have full instant access to:
268,000 posts on every subject imaginable contributed by 1000's of members worldwide.
25000 photos and videos mainly relating to the British Merchant Navy.
Members experienced in research to help you find out about friends and relatives who served.
The camaraderie of 1000's of ex Merchant Seamen who use the site for recreation & nostalgia.
Here we are all equal whether ex Deck Boy or Commodore of the Fleet.
A wealth of experience and expertise from all departments spanning 70+ years.
It is simple to register and membership is absolutely free.
N.B. If you are going to be requesting help from one of the forums with finding historical details of a relative
please include as much information as possible to help members assist you. We certainly need full names,
date and place of birth / death where possible plus any other details you have such as discharge book numbers etc.
Please post all questions onto the appropriate forum
As I feel there are quite a few on here that have NOT updated their Email addresses, can you please do so. It is of importance that your Email is current, so as we can contact you if applicable . Send me the details in my Private Message Box.
Thank You Doc Vernon
Please log in with your username and password
-
13th August 2013, 09:16 PM
#21
I am absolutely convinced that the Pendennis was the only 1950s onward one that was capable of fast conversion to a carrier . The hull had a band of plates and rivets at main deck level as reinforcement , They were there as deck strengthening just in case , and the Government had =contributed to the costs . I will stand to be corrected , but I am firmly a believer that the Transvaal and Windsor were welded construction without the strengthening in that area , so I suggest it may have been a Harland and Wolff design that was the secret
Rob Page R855150 - British & Commonwealth Shipping ( 1965 - 1973 ) Gulf Oil -( 1973 - 1975 ) Sealink ( 1975 - 1986 ) 

-
14th August 2013, 09:08 AM
#22

Originally Posted by
Chris Isaac
What do you mean by "common knowledge", first I have heard of it.
Why would it be required when in the early 60s the RN had plenty of aircraft carriers.
Because you hadn't heard of IT, doesn't mean that it wasn't a design feature.
-
15th August 2013, 08:03 AM
#23

Originally Posted by
vic mcclymont
Because you hadn't heard of IT, doesn't mean that it wasn't a design feature.
Absolutely correct but to say it was "common knowledge" when it plainly wasn't is my point.
It is possible that Edinburgh and Pretoria may have been built with this in mind but later than that I doubt it.
Why would any ship designed in the late fifties and sixties be built with aircraft carrier conversion in mind. Any world war started at that time would be over in 15 minutes.
Last edited by Chris Isaac; 15th August 2013 at 09:50 AM.
-
15th August 2013, 11:19 AM
#24
Re: Winchester Castle Trivia

Originally Posted by
Chris Isaac
Why would any ship designed in the late fifties and sixties be built with aircraft carrier conversion in mind. Any world war started at that time would be over in 15 minutes.
Chris 'Common Knowledge' is always subjective to what field you are in at the time. As a Supt attending new buildings in the 60's and 70's we had to, on certain ships, increase the scantlings in certain areas to enable the vessels to be quickly converted or take on defence equipment in the case of need. I have no doubt in my mind that larger ships at that time would have had their scantlings increased in certain areas to enable flight or launching decks to be fitted at a later date if required.
As for any world war being over in 15 minutes at that time, history has or may have proved that statement a little wide of the mark, there were in those periods plenty of serious conflicts abounding with numerous participants who had atomic capability but no one had the termerity to push 'the button' for self annihilation. We live in far more dangerous atomic times now when fanatics would have no hesitation in pushing the button because their god will reward them with bountiful gifts and virgins when they reach the other side. I felt a lot safer in those eras than I do now
-
15th August 2013, 11:37 AM
#25
Re: Winchester Castle Trivia
Regarding Merchant vessels being built with the intention of converting them to other vessel types, a good example of this were the clipper vessels built at Middlesbrough I believe, these were 20+ knot vessels built for the fruit ( vegetable variety) which could be converted quickly to an armed merchant cruiser, these were built for an Israeli company. Some people on this site have posted as being on these vessels. Also I am not sure what year it was discarded but I was on vessels built in the 50s still being fitted out with degaussing gear under Admiralty contract which the owners received I believe special compensation for. As regards the scantlings of certain new buildings believe you will find in various vessel types had special reinforced decks for any future gun emplacements. In the 60s and 70s every British merchant vessel carried secret log book ciphers to be opened on the declaration of war, also all the gear for the testing of radio active material kept in sealed containers usually stowed under the focscle head. Obviously all this no longer exists or if it does it will be on a much smaller scale due to the lack of British flag tonnage. Regards John Sabourn
-
15th August 2013, 01:09 PM
#26
The last time I saw Degausing gear was on a tanker built in 1963, this was removed in dry dock in 1984, I believe the value of the scrap almost paid for the dry dock.
In the 70s and 80s on VLCCs we had the Admiralty Code Books Ciphers, these were used sometimes when observing Soviet Shipping activities in various oceans.
All the Deck Officers had signed the Official Secrets Act.
Cheers
Brian.
-
15th August 2013, 02:54 PM
#27
Re: Winchester Castle Trivia

Originally Posted by
Chris Isaac
Absolutely correct but to say it was "common knowledge" when it plainly wasn't is my point.
It is possible that Edinburgh and Pretoria may have been built with this in mind but later than that I doubt it.
Why would any ship designed in the late fifties and sixties be built with aircraft carrier conversion in mind. Any world war started at that time would be over in 15 minutes.
it was a well known fact that the Admiralty Shipowners and shipyards worked together on ship design in the sixties.
If as you state it would be over in 15 minutes, why did they fit (the Admiralty, charged a nominal fee) deguassing gear as standard to UK Merchant ships?
-
15th August 2013, 03:52 PM
#28
Re: Winchester Castle Trivia

Originally Posted by
vic mcclymont
it was a well known fact that the Admiralty Shipowners and shipyards worked together on ship design in the sixties.
If as you state it would be over in 15 minutes, why did they fit (the Admiralty, charged a nominal fee) deguassing gear as standard to UK Merchant ships?
That is easy.... plenty of minefields still existed well into the 1960s. (Maybe still do for all I know) Anyone who has made a trip round the North Sea to Hamburg will tell you that.
-
15th August 2013, 06:44 PM
#29
In the Southampton Union Castle Office there were the Plans to convert the Pendennis Castle to an Aircraft Carrier if needed , the critical adaption was to do with the riveted belt around the deck level , None of the others had that , the Pendennis was a design ordered in 1955 to replace the Arundel Castle , so there may have been a Royal Naval need to have a back up plan . The HP Turbines had some additional nozzles that were locked out to prevent use , these were there to allow the additional short periods of speed required for landings and takeoffs in some wind and weather conditions . In 1955 , HMS Illustrious , Formidable , Indomitable , Implacable , Indefatigable . Pioneer were all scrapped Perseus was put into reserve . Majestic and Hercules sold abroad Eagle , Africa , Hermes , Arrogant . Monmouth and Polyphemus were all cancelled , so in strategic terms we were low on carriers at the time
Rob Page R855150 - British & Commonwealth Shipping ( 1965 - 1973 ) Gulf Oil -( 1973 - 1975 ) Sealink ( 1975 - 1986 ) 

-
15th August 2013, 08:16 PM
#30
Getting back to the Wichester Castle as the original subject,I did two trips on her in 1950. The Bosun was Jim("Lardy") Perry. He was,shall we say,rather coarse. He was also a good Bosun and a damn fine Seaman. They didn't come any better than "Lardy"Perry. Anyone else on this site remember him?
Similar Threads
-
By Ian Whyte in forum Welcome - Please say hello.
Replies: 33
Last Post: 24th June 2024, 06:34 AM
-
By Michael Alan Kingsbury in forum Esso
Replies: 5
Last Post: 17th November 2014, 09:05 AM
-
By happy daze john in oz in forum Trivia and Interesting Stuff
Replies: 4
Last Post: 18th October 2014, 05:35 AM
-
By Errol Chandler in forum Union Castle
Replies: 21
Last Post: 20th May 2013, 03:24 PM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules