By registering with our site you will have full instant access to:
268,000 posts on every subject imaginable contributed by 1000's of members worldwide.
25000 photos and videos mainly relating to the British Merchant Navy.
Members experienced in research to help you find out about friends and relatives who served.
The camaraderie of 1000's of ex Merchant Seamen who use the site for recreation & nostalgia.
Here we are all equal whether ex Deck Boy or Commodore of the Fleet.
A wealth of experience and expertise from all departments spanning 70+ years.
It is simple to register and membership is absolutely free.
N.B. If you are going to be requesting help from one of the forums with finding historical details of a relative
please include as much information as possible to help members assist you. We certainly need full names,
date and place of birth / death where possible plus any other details you have such as discharge book numbers etc.
Please post all questions onto the appropriate forum

-
18th October 2013, 02:25 PM
#11
Re: Draw your own conclusions !!!!
On being shown around a Naval vessel many years ago , I was surprised by the high manning levels compared to a Merchant ship , on questioning it , I was told that is in case some get shot , maybe that is why they have all the Flag officers so they can shoot a few and not notice
Rob Page R855150 - British & Commonwealth Shipping ( 1965 - 1973 ) Gulf Oil -( 1973 - 1975 ) Sealink ( 1975 - 1986 ) 

-
19th October 2013, 05:25 AM
#12
Re: Draw your own conclusions !!!!
Always amazes me the amount of Admirals, Vice and Rear, that the Australian Navy produce for special occasions. I doubt very much that they have enough warships to go round to give them 1 apiece. As regards the high level of manning as you say they are at least doubled up on the specialists jobs. During the Falklands war I assisted in loading a small Hull tug which was going down with the fleet. There appeared to be more in the Naval Detachment (Radio and Communications) than the whole crew of the tug. As most and I would think all merchant ships that went would have had a naval presence on board for such as ciphers etc. they must have come to about double the ships complement on some vessels. Cheers John Sabourn
-
19th October 2013, 05:42 AM
#13
Re: Draw your own conclusions !!!!
Whilst in UK I read an article about giving one billion to Nigeria so they could join the space race.
The way to do it is for thta money to be spent in UK on the space race, the crew of any spacecraft going to say Mars be all the politicians.
As for bringing back prison hulks forget it #9 last time they did that they were exported here to Oz. we have enough of our own lunatics runninmg the asylum without any more coming here.


Happy daze John in Oz.
Life is too short to blend in.
John Strange R737787
World Traveller

-
19th October 2013, 06:40 AM
#14
Re: Draw your own conclusions !!!!
Regardless of the top brass with which our armed services are born to carry, I have every regard for our naval personell and foot soldiers so to speak. As have already said I worked with same for the best part of 4 years. This included Special Forces our own and others of friendly nations. Most of whom are normal persons although very dedicated to their job in most instances. They are human the same as us and well remember careening around Fort William in a Naval Bomb Disposal Unit visiting various pubs. The locals accepted this behaviour as just high spirits ( even though it was just beer we were drinking). Many a time had a Thunder Flash thrown in my cabin as a joke, no H and S to worry about in those days. The UKs armed forces the same as Australian, the general populance owes a lot to. Regards John Sabourn
-
19th October 2013, 02:13 PM
#15
Re: Draw your own conclusions !!!!

Originally Posted by
j.sabourn
There appeared to be more in the Naval Detachment (Radio and Communications) than the whole crew of the tug. As most and I would think all merchant ships that went would have had a naval presence on board for such as ciphers etc. they must have come to about double the ships complement on some vessels. Cheers John Sabourn
Hello John,
I was on the chartered ammunition ship 'LYCAON' ex-Blue Funnel. There were 7 of us I think in the naval party, 4 of us were comms, 1 medic, 1 CPO and 1 officer in charge. The ship had her own radio officer. I think a lot of MN personnel don't truly understand the RNs role and seek to compare it with their own ships. RN ships have always been top heavy with crew for various reasons. Communications traffic on warships would be too much for just one or two ROs. A merchant vessel has a defined crew list for its role, whether a tanker, cargo, coaster etc. A man-o-war has a completely different role. It is primarily a fighting platform at sea and it needs its manpower to sail and fight in that role.
However, as has already been pointed out, we are top heavy with brass and that's because the Govt have done away with our fleet. Problem is they still have not done away with our role in the world i.e. permanent member of the UN, U.S special relationship etc. To my mind if you want to have that amount of influence in the world then you can't do it with a fleet of coasters. That is slightly unfair of course as some of the ships we do have and those coming along are the best in the world.
Regards
Hugh
Last edited by Hugh; 19th October 2013 at 02:15 PM.
"If Blood was the price
We had to pay for our freedom
Then the Merchant Ship Sailors
Paid it in full”
www.sscityofcairo.co.uk
-
19th October 2013, 02:18 PM
#16
-
19th October 2013, 02:31 PM
#17
Re: Draw your own conclusions !!!!
Know what you mean. Anyhow most MN ships don't even carry a Radio Officer and haven't for some time. Communications is a vital quality in any warlike situation. On one of the supply vessels which was converted for coastal patrol around the Falklands after the final outcome, I had to go down for the trials after the conversion, she had a couple of Bofors on the wings of the bridge and one was manned by the ships cooks (RN) and the other by the Royal Marine detachment on board. Also the 2 Fast patrol craft were manned by R. marines. The sergeant major of marines was the one who had to cede to the argos on the island of South Georgia that they first landed. He was raring to go back. John Sabourn
-
19th October 2013, 02:37 PM
#18
Re: Draw your own conclusions !!!!
Sure is we used to do a lot of saturation diving in various locks. Were known as Naval Party 1007. Cheers John Sabourn
-
19th October 2013, 02:55 PM
#19
Re: Draw your own conclusions !!!!
A list of Naval Parties here: http://www.naval-history.net/xBW-RNNavalParties.htm
I see NP 1007 was 'SEAFORTH CLANSMAN' 81-87 and 89.
I was in NP 1900 'LYCAON' 82, 83 and NP 1015 'OIL ENDEAVOUR' 84.
Regards
Hugh
"If Blood was the price
We had to pay for our freedom
Then the Merchant Ship Sailors
Paid it in full”
www.sscityofcairo.co.uk
-
20th October 2013, 12:13 AM
#20
Re: Draw your own conclusions !!!!
If my memory is correct I believe the conversion on the vessel I was there for the Trials before handing over to the Navy was renamed HMS Guardian or Sentinel or something similar. Cheers John Sabourn
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules