Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 50

Thread: Singapore Accident

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    W.A.
    Posts
    25,456
    Thanks (Given)
    13696
    Thanks (Received)
    14621
    Likes (Given)
    20201
    Likes (Received)
    81727

    Default Crew Numbers

    This always reminds me of program on TV Name That Tune where the contestants had to name the tune in as less notes as possible. There were always those trying to curry favour with the owners, and can just imagine them saying I'll do it with 7, and then the next saying I''ll do it with 6, then 5 and then so forth. I was called to rejoin a ship with 1 seaman, and told them to stick it. Already told the story, ship sailed with someone else and had a fire. He obviously didnt mind sailing like that. Good companys man. Cheers John Sabourn.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    W.A.
    Posts
    25,456
    Thanks (Given)
    13696
    Thanks (Received)
    14621
    Likes (Given)
    20201
    Likes (Received)
    81727

    Default Brian

    They break the rules on taking over the watch. In the Preliminary, nothing in these rules shall interfere with the keeping of a proper lookout. Some vessels this is now impossible due to crew numbers. Although probably class glancing at Radar screen when one can as keeping a proper lookout. Cheers John Sabourn

  3. #23
    Gulliver's Avatar
    Gulliver Guest

    Default Hudson Firth v.Loch Ryan 1957...

    (Rob # 20 -Would there be an Official Inquiry if there was no loss of life ?)
    • No, but there would be a Formal Investigation into the collision by the BoT which would obviously have been recorded.

      Gulliver
    Last edited by Gulliver; 5th March 2013 at 09:03 AM.

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    ottawa canada
    Posts
    644
    Thanks (Given)
    389
    Thanks (Received)
    592
    Likes (Given)
    2262
    Likes (Received)
    1949

    Default collision, hudson firth 1957

    gulliver, .... many thanks for that info. yes it was off devon, as we called into Falmouth for inspection before proceeding to hull where we paid off the first week in July. I still have it in my mind that we were at fault as we hit her forward of the bridge on the port side, putting a good sized hole in her hold.
    tks anyway, guess will never know the total outcome.
    regards stan

  5. #25
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    South of England
    Posts
    6
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2

    Default

    I never understand comments that there was no-one on the bridge etc. Many times I have been on deck looked up at the Bridge and can see no-one, but I know it is manned. So how some one on another ship can tell I don't know. I'm not trying to defend the crap standards of watchkeeping, I just don't know how you can tell.

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Bolton UK
    Posts
    15,002
    Thanks (Given)
    20832
    Thanks (Received)
    11112
    Likes (Given)
    30414
    Likes (Received)
    37180

    Default

    Well Andy it is like this, when a ship is overtaking and on a collision course as well, look through the binocculars and see all the way though the wheel house and Chart room. The bridge wings empty, not a soul in sight, call them on VHF radio and no one answers, where are they?????
    On auto and turned in the most probable answer. I have experienced it many times.
    Cheers Brian,

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    138
    Thanks (Given)
    1
    Thanks (Received)
    15
    Likes (Given)
    37
    Likes (Received)
    51

    Default Collision in Singapore Strait AND UNDERMANNING

    Even the best binoculars cannot always tell if there is a man at the wheel.

    I found vhf calls a waste of precious time when dealing with morons.

    Leaning on the whistle and an aldis nearly always got the best results with rogue overtakers

    on undermanning there must be some coercion,cooperation, collusion and or corruption between wretched owners and flag states

    when an owner is big enough like one scandinavian owner this could happen.

    The imo is supposed to sort out this sort of thing. It is an obvious safety hazard. The unions are either corrupt as well or too wimpish.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    618
    Thanks (Given)
    21
    Thanks (Received)
    246
    Likes (Given)
    46
    Likes (Received)
    1129

    Default

    Bit of a sweeping statement there Brian. If there seems to be nobody in the wheelhouse then they are most probably
    in the chartroom.

    And there is nothing heroic or macho about standing on when the other guy is supposed to give way.
    If it looks like he is leaving it too late or not al all , take your own steps to keep clear.
    The smaller ship in the video should never have allowed the situation to get so far.

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Bolton UK
    Posts
    15,002
    Thanks (Given)
    20832
    Thanks (Received)
    11112
    Likes (Given)
    30414
    Likes (Received)
    37180

    Default

    Hi John,
    Most ships these days do not have a seperate Chart room as they did many years ago, it is all in the wheel house, Chart table etc etc. Even on the VLCCs I was on, built in the late 60s, no chart room, all in the wheelhouse..

    I have never said it is heroic and macho to stand on when a give way vessel is closing in. Where did you get that daft information from ??? are you keeping a good look out ???

    If you read my previous posts , post No. 8. on this subject you will read that I have always told the other ship of my intentions to get out of the way. usually by taking a round turn out of it and getting out of the way fast.

    Maybe you never experienced these cowboys, I saw many like that, especially arouind the southern North Sea and Dover Straits areas.
    Cheers
    Brian.
    Last edited by Captain Kong; 7th March 2013 at 08:20 PM.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Waterlooville Hampshire UK
    Posts
    6,936
    Thanks (Given)
    1693
    Thanks (Received)
    3691
    Likes (Given)
    3684
    Likes (Received)
    13355

    Default

    I found this MAIB study from 2004 quite interesting

    http://www.maritimeconsultant.com/Br...chstanding.pdf

    Don't the powers that be ever heed the warning signs , I suppose the dollar is more important than the fellow
    Rob Page R855150 - British & Commonwealth Shipping ( 1965 - 1973 ) Gulf Oil -( 1973 - 1975 ) Sealink ( 1975 - 1986 )

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Singapore / Nha Be run
    By Jerry Cassels in forum Shell Tankers
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 6th October 2017, 02:37 PM
  2. Another Accident at Sea
    By moktay in forum Merchant Navy General Postings
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 5th June 2014, 06:06 AM
  3. Sheppey bridge accident
    By Colin Pook in forum General Member Discussion
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 30th September 2013, 10:19 AM
  4. canadians out of Singapore
    By Peter Harrison in forum Ask the Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11th August 2010, 12:15 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •