do the police have a right to reveal infomation

[robpage]

[QUOTE=Bengy Roberts;287678

Quote Originally Posted by robpage View Post
if you were asked by a judge . If you thought something was true and repeated that you would be adjudged as telling the truth , so by repetition and definition instead of allegation you have spread a libellous story about a man who alleges innocence

,
okay,,yeah [/QUOTE]

okay,,yeah , takes a man to admit he is wrong , thank you

[robpage]

When we became part of the MOJ we were tied into the Government Computer network. The system was monitored and recorded any sites visited. It also flagged up if you visited any pornographic sites. Our security manager was caught out visiting such sites and the monitoring system caught him out.
So I find it strange that the Detective has recorded these allegations.
Vic

we became part of the Co-op , and had an ethical IT department , I had a CV blocked one day , so I spoke to IT , it was blocked because of implied pornography - rude words to you and me - OK what is the word , COX I was told , it sounds like cocks . I did explain it was the mans surname .

[vic mcclymont]

Firstly I find the info produced by the detective rather strange. When the Magistrates Courts became part of the ministry of Justice, we used there computer systems.
These systems were closely monitored, producing reports on request of sites visited.
Our security manager was caught out by the system and fired.
Why has the detective taken nine years to report the alleged breach,what has he got to gain?
Vc

[happy daze john in oz]

Privacy legislation here in Oz make sit almost impossible for any information to be revealed.
However, one TV presenter and two MP's have been caught out looking at porn on computers.
The presenter also charged with sourcing child pornography information.

The question has now been raised as to how this mat effect any trial as information now in the public domain, information which at the time should not have been released.

[Keith at Tregenna]

Privacy legislation here seems odd to me, what should be private often is not.

The DVLC sells vehicle reg and driver details ad hoc esp to private parking companies,
our Council sell resident details, it goes on.

Keith.

[robpage]

Where I see this has gone wrong in my opinion the police are there to uphold the law and not to be the judge or the jury so where a policeman starts to tell confidential information he is going against his own codes and passing ad actioning judgement in this case it appears that sometime in the past there was a raid on Damon greens Office which should never have taken place whilst the police were looking for a source of information for a government leak Green being an opposition minister at the time I believe that some of the policemen were in the deep do do for doing it and this is obviously payback time , that isn't the sort of policing I want to see in this country

[vic mcclymont]

The ex policeman is being investigated, apparently when you leave the force all documentation regarding crimes should be handed in, this Policeman did not?
The head of the Manchester force has stated that this is all wrong.
Vic

[Louis the Amigo]

Hi shipmates, The government mandate is for all departments to sell information to the highest bider, your information is public record ? you have no rights , only the people above the law in the U.K. have any rights.