By registering with our site you will have full instant access to:
268,000 posts on every subject imaginable contributed by 1000's of members worldwide.
25000 photos and videos mainly relating to the British Merchant Navy.
Members experienced in research to help you find out about friends and relatives who served.
The camaraderie of 1000's of ex Merchant Seamen who use the site for recreation & nostalgia.
Here we are all equal whether ex Deck Boy or Commodore of the Fleet.
A wealth of experience and expertise from all departments spanning 70+ years.
It is simple to register and membership is absolutely free.
N.B. If you are going to be requesting help from one of the forums with finding historical details of a relative
please include as much information as possible to help members assist you. We certainly need full names,
date and place of birth / death where possible plus any other details you have such as discharge book numbers etc.
Please post all questions onto the appropriate forum

-
23rd March 2019, 01:40 AM
#41
Re: Pure madness.................again
#40 Let’s hope they’re not of the EU variety. JS
Last edited by j.sabourn; 23rd March 2019 at 01:44 AM.
-
23rd March 2019, 02:53 AM
#42
Re: Pure madness.................again
Having never legally owned a firearm , I always thought the categories came in different types for certification. A shotgun was only legal for that type of firearm and a pistol was verified for a certain calibre. Military firearms had to be specially authorized. If one Certificate covers all is pretty pointless in having in any case. American gun laws I would imagine are again totally different. As is in their constitution the right to bear arms. Which today there would be ample reason for, if just for self protection. In the Middle East according to media footage every man and his dog is running around with automatic weapons. Which leads one to believe there is no gun control whatsoever.
JS
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
23rd March 2019, 03:29 AM
#43
Re: Pure madness.................again
js, wa has the most restrictive laws in Australia, most shooters in oz have AB and H, AB is shotgun,rimfire/centre fire, and H is handgun, cat C and D for self laoding firearms are very hard to obtain. people seem to think that the usa has guns laying on the street just waiting to be picked up, the reality is that some states, and even cities within states have laws that are more restrictive than your home state. the cities like Washington, Detroit, Chicago, Baltimore, have horrendous armed crime rates, and the most restrictive laws. if you take out the gang/drug related shootings, (what the yank cops refer to as **** on ****) the murder rate is comparable to any other western country. want a country that has virtually no legally owned guns? try mexico, Honduras, venazuela, belize, check their stats. then people say that they are third world countries, I don't get that? people are people, first world, third world (where is the second world?) they all bleed. I could write a book on the fallacies of gun control, but I have found that over the years the antis are not worth bothering with, any facts you put their way are trumped by feelings. may as well keep my breath to cool my porridge. off to check on the nsw election, have a good afternoon.
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
23rd March 2019, 03:53 AM
#44
Re: Pure madness.................again
Going out to a do shortly. No guns just swords. Dont carry so people can see but in a case, just so I don’t get accused of being Blackbeard. Even though if I had a beard it would be ginger , although think today maybe white. Was advised years ago by a police Officer that if I caught an intruder in the house and had a firearm to shoot him, but just make sure he was dead before they got there. On ships with firearms I was against as knew I would have no hesitation in using if necessary. This hands up business is for the Boy Scouts of the world. JS.
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
23rd March 2019, 10:09 AM
#45
Re: Pure madness.................again
I sailed on an American flag vessel, the master was the only American on board and he had a rather extreme view on guns and claimed to be never more than a couple of feet from a gun in every room in his house. I asked why he needed them and his reply was that he was allowed to shoot anyone who tried to get into his house.
He recounted a story of one of his neighbours who saw a guy walking across his back yard so he shot him with a 44 magnum. He then had the afterthought that maybe he would get into trouble so he went out and dragged the guy to his house and draped him over the window sill, then called the sheriff.
The sheriffs reaction when he saw the scene was to comment "sure was one determined SOB, he still tried to get in your house even with that damn big hole in him.
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
23rd March 2019, 10:19 AM
#46
Re: Pure madness.................again

Originally Posted by
j.sabourn
Having never legally owned a firearm , I always thought the categories came in different types for certification. A shotgun was only legal for that type of firearm and a pistol was verified for a certain calibre. Military firearms had to be specially authorized. If one Certificate covers all is pretty pointless in having in any case. American gun laws I would imagine are again totally different. As is in their constitution the right to bear arms. Which today there would be ample reason for, if just for self protection. In the Middle East according to media footage every man and his dog is running around with automatic weapons. Which leads one to believe there is no gun control whatsoever.
JS
Some years ago I was working at an LNG construction site in Yemen, situated about midway between Mukalla and Aden. Part of the job was to train local labour in how to use my companies product.
During a chat with some of these guys, they said that they came from Mukalla, anyone from Aden? I asked and got no response, they told me people from Aden were not civilised, why? because they carry their guns in the market place, was the answer, we dont.
So you have guns? yes, what kind - AK47. Why? because every boy gets his gun when he reaches 12 years old and is taught how to use it.
I didnt take the discussion any further, felt there was no point as it was accepted practice.
Even back then (09/10) there was trouble between North and South, gunfire heard every night, after ten days I was pleased to get out, Total had two private flights daily from airstrip inside site, guarded by the army.
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
23rd March 2019, 08:18 PM
#47
Re: Pure madness.................again
On MSN online news 20 ****** activists were arrested in Germany last night, they were planning attacks on western society.
Vic
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
23rd March 2019, 08:57 PM
#48
Re: Pure madness.................again
This thread is going well so far but please just watch the P-------l input .
Thank You
Senior Site Moderator-Member and Friend of this Website
R697530
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
24th March 2019, 03:22 AM
#49
Re: Pure madness.................again

Originally Posted by
j.sabourn
Remember the good old bad old days, when you never even saw a British bobby armed ? Maybe. Historians can place the time and reason why it all changed. ? JWS..
It seems (In London) that it is rare to even see a policeman with or without arms.
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
24th March 2019, 09:55 AM
#50
Re: Pure madness.................again

Originally Posted by
john walker
It seems (In London) that it is rare to even see a policeman with or without arms.
It was not uncommon 10 years ago to see police on foot patrol in Sunderland wearing sidearms
-
Post Thanks / Like
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules