Page 9 of 13 FirstFirst ... 7 8 9 10 11 ... LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 125

Thread: Bridge destroyed by a containership

  1. #81
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Sunbury Victoria Australia
    Posts
    26,186
    Thanks (Given)
    9455
    Thanks (Received)
    10584
    Likes (Given)
    111985
    Likes (Received)
    47719

    Default Re: Bridge destroyed by a containership

    As to the 1851 law, no idea what it is.
    But shipping companies have not change since our days, if they can find a way out to reduce costs they will.
    No doubt hidden away in the mist of time there sits this law.
    Maybe when time comes they will explain, lawyers will no doubt be interested,
    Happy daze John in Oz.

    Life is too short to blend in.

    John Strange R737787
    World Traveller

  2. Thanks j.sabourn, Mike Hall thanked for this post
    Likes Des Taff Jenkins liked this post
  3. #82
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    W.A.
    Posts
    25,475
    Thanks (Given)
    13701
    Thanks (Received)
    14627
    Likes (Given)
    20207
    Likes (Received)
    81765

    Default Re: Bridge destroyed by a containership

    #82. More so the Sea ones John. JS
    R575129

  4. #83
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Cooma NSW
    Posts
    10,038
    Thanks (Given)
    11386
    Thanks (Received)
    5672
    Likes (Given)
    48471
    Likes (Received)
    29312
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Bridge destroyed by a containership

    The 1851 Law States that one must pull the wool over the other protagonists eyes first, in order to stuff his statement up the hawse pipe,
    Or first in best dressed.
    John just as an aside was that ship called the William Rhuys? or do you know if it became that with a change of name?
    R510868
    Lest We Forget

  5. Thanks j.sabourn thanked for this post
    Likes happy daze john in oz liked this post
  6. #84
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    W.A.
    Posts
    25,475
    Thanks (Given)
    13701
    Thanks (Received)
    14627
    Likes (Given)
    20207
    Likes (Received)
    81765

    Default Re: Bridge destroyed by a containership

    I have spelt it two different ways Des but thinking back it was just the Ruys . All the passengers had to be flown back to Europe or most of them at least. She was on her way out but had to return to BA. Due to the collision. That channel into BA was supposed to be dredged to 27 feet which means that was the least depth of water at mean low water spring tides. The height of tide was on top of that 27 feet could have been another 10 feet . However I was on the bridge prior to the collision with the pilot and I got the distinct impression she was touching the mud and sliding. So to my thinking the dredging of the channel was another Spanish Manana Manana and back to another siesta on behalf of the harbour authority’s. This is what I told the legal team. No one else would say the obvious.JS
    R575129

  7. Thanks Des Taff Jenkins thanked for this post
    Likes happy daze john in oz liked this post
  8. #85
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    W.A.
    Posts
    25,475
    Thanks (Given)
    13701
    Thanks (Received)
    14627
    Likes (Given)
    20207
    Likes (Received)
    81765

    Default Re: Bridge destroyed by a containership

    #84 And if it’s a black sheep’s wool Des then further up and over the Gypsy and down the Spurling pipe and let the chain do it’s worse . Cheers JS
    R575129

  9. #86
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Location
    Northumberland
    Posts
    252
    Thanks (Given)
    326
    Thanks (Received)
    264
    Likes (Given)
    1479
    Likes (Received)
    1068

    Default Re: Bridge destroyed by a containership

    #81 John not sure if you were asking me about smiths dock but I have not worked there unless you count the week the tug I was on was in there to have her propeller replaced.
    I think the act that John in Oz is referring to is a limit of loss to the insurance company of only being liable to the value of the ship and cargo.
    This depending on who you believe is approx $50 million whereas the claims for rebuilding the bridge, compensation for loss of trade, loss of earnings, damages not to mention the 6 workers that lost their lives. That total will run into the billions of dollars.
    Regards Michael

  10. #87
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    W.A.
    Posts
    25,475
    Thanks (Given)
    13701
    Thanks (Received)
    14627
    Likes (Given)
    20207
    Likes (Received)
    81765

    Default Re: Bridge destroyed by a containership

    Trying to remember the word for it something like General Average but not sure ,too long ago. I dumped all my books years ago too much to cart around . Cheers JS
    Just had a thought on general average, that works on the principle of all stake holders in a maritime venture share any losses from a voluntary sacrifice of part of ship or cargo. So think that is going up the wrong garden path. JS
    Re Smiths Drydock don’t think it’s there anymore is it ? Know the Jungle ( Northumberland
    Arms) isn’t , all the yuppies now living there ! JS
    The only ones who could cover such a huge claim would I say be Lloyds of London , as all their members take on huge insurance gambles on a handshake. Would break a few people and would have to join the dole queue and come back to earth. Cheers JS
    Last edited by j.sabourn; 6th April 2024 at 10:23 AM.
    R575129

  11. #88
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Location
    Northumberland
    Posts
    252
    Thanks (Given)
    326
    Thanks (Received)
    264
    Likes (Given)
    1479
    Likes (Received)
    1068

    Default Re: Bridge destroyed by a containership

    John, smith's dock closed in 1987 I think, housing on the site now, I haven't been there for years but I think they kept 1 or 2 docks as marinas.
    Had some good times in the jungle, good job the bus used to come down the bank to the ferry landing.
    Regards Michael

  12. Thanks j.sabourn thanked for this post
  13. #89
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    North East Scotland
    Posts
    2,627
    Thanks (Given)
    1489
    Thanks (Received)
    1095
    Likes (Given)
    12023
    Likes (Received)
    3334

    Default Re: Bridge destroyed by a containership

    Posts #85 Des & #86 John S. Ruys & Zone. Wm. Rotterdam.

    Willem Ruys Built 1947 23629 Tons. Sold 1965.

    Achille Lauro ex Willien Ruys 1965 Italian.

    Bill.

  14. Thanks Des Taff Jenkins thanked for this post
  15. #90
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    CHESTER LE STREET
    Posts
    2,728
    Thanks (Given)
    757
    Thanks (Received)
    1481
    Likes (Given)
    14436
    Likes (Received)
    9219

    Default Re: Bridge destroyed by a containership

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Black View Post
    John, smith's dock closed in 1987 I think, housing on the site now, I haven't been there for years but I think they kept 1 or 2 docks as marinas.
    Had some good times in the jungle, good job the bus used to come down the bank to the ferry landing.
    Regards Michael
    In early 80s I used to visit Smiths at least once a week; I used to see the fitting shop manager, it was huge and lots of men working in there as well as the guys actually onboard the vessels in dock.
    Always got clear before knocking off time as it was like a tidal wave of humanity surging out of the gates; it was also a good idea to get through Wallsend as well before Swans chucked out as you couldnt get past the yard till it subsided.

Page 9 of 13 FirstFirst ... 7 8 9 10 11 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •