Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Manchester Port 1952

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    jersey
    Posts
    338
    Thanks (Given)
    638
    Thanks (Received)
    317
    Likes (Given)
    606
    Likes (Received)
    599

    Default Manchester Port 1952

    Engagement Manchester

    Discharge just a date
    Nothing in conduct
    And signed off by British Consul

    Fgn voyage

    Could this be when he called Franco a bastard and got locked up!

  2. Likes Des Taff Jenkins liked this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    jersey
    Posts
    338
    Thanks (Given)
    638
    Thanks (Received)
    317
    Likes (Given)
    606
    Likes (Received)
    599

    Default Re: Manchester Port 1952

    Doubt it.

    This ship sailed to and from the Great Lakes
    Did seaman get thrown off a ship for bad behaviour.
    From what I see he could have been thrown off in Philadelphia
    According to the dates?

  4. Likes Des Taff Jenkins liked this post
  5. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Blue Mountains NSW
    Posts
    25,149
    Thanks (Given)
    47028
    Thanks (Received)
    13552
    Likes (Given)
    54863
    Likes (Received)
    41091
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default Re: Manchester Port 1952

    Who are we talking about here please!! Confused!??
    Senior Site Moderator-Member and Friend of this Website

    R697530

  6. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    W.A.
    Posts
    25,460
    Thanks (Given)
    13698
    Thanks (Received)
    14624
    Likes (Given)
    20202
    Likes (Received)
    81751

    Default Re: Manchester Port 1952

    If he was signed off by the British Consul , think he would of been out of line to remark on his ability and conduct. He may have gone off sick, and left behind. He may of been in Gaol , there could be other reasons. More than probable he could have left by mutual agreement. You seem to think he may have been the devil incarnate , did he have a police record that you know of ? I signed off a seamen as said in another post, who was off the Tasmanian ferry , and he was like a lovesick duck.So sent him back to Melbourne before telling the owners. And the seaman’s union who supplied him . The seaman in question thanked me for doing it as was the only way he would get off the ship apart from harming himself. Hope he married his girlfriend one of the stewardesses off the ferry. This period was after the discharges were used , so no need to report on , in the log book just put mutual agreement. JS
    R575129

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •