By registering with our site you will have full instant access to:
268,000 posts on every subject imaginable contributed by 1000's of members worldwide.
25000 photos and videos mainly relating to the British Merchant Navy.
Members experienced in research to help you find out about friends and relatives who served.
The camaraderie of 1000's of ex Merchant Seamen who use the site for recreation & nostalgia.
Here we are all equal whether ex Deck Boy or Commodore of the Fleet.
A wealth of experience and expertise from all departments spanning 70+ years.
It is simple to register and membership is absolutely free.
N.B. If you are going to be requesting help from one of the forums with finding historical details of a relative
please include as much information as possible to help members assist you. We certainly need full names,
date and place of birth / death where possible plus any other details you have such as discharge book numbers etc.
Please post all questions onto the appropriate forum
As I feel there are quite a few on here that have NOT updated their Email addresses, can you please do so. It is of importance that your Email is current, so as we can contact you if applicable . Send me the details in my Private Message Box.
Thank You Doc Vernon
Please log in with your username and password
-
24th July 2018, 12:03 PM
#1
6 on 6 off
I see Nautilus has finally slated the 6 on 6 off system. Not before time either. Has proved to be. Not conducive for a rest pattern and was brought out to accomodate the reduced manning schedule which was always known among seamen to be a big con. To get 6 hours of rest is nigh on impossible on a ship under this con, and I blame this for the many years of sleep abpnia I suffer still today. People today talk about safety and ignore the blatant first failure in the system which all goes down to reduced manning in my book. Read the report in this months nautical paper. Another failure of the system. JWS.
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
24th July 2018, 01:27 PM
#2
Re: 6 on 6 off
DONE 6 ON 6 OFF Not happy,
Also 5 on 5 off Impossible to get 3 hours sleep.
5 to 10 pm watch and then 3 to 8am watch then 12 to 5 pm and then 10 to 3 am watch and so on.
so after the 3 to 8 am only four hours off , throw in a boat drill and fire drill, no sleep at all, so from 3 am to 5 pm, 14 hours without a break. then back on watch, KNACKARD.
Not good for Safety or Health.
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
24th July 2018, 01:42 PM
#3
Re: 6 on 6 off
Brian was even worse off shore , but that was the system, as master the rig or platform expected 18 hours from the master as regards shiphanldilng discharging and back loading. Did 26 hours once to comply with the rigs request. If you didn’t work in with their wishes you stood to lose the charter. Then going from the Brent field back into Lerwick thick fog. Sleep what is that, you either played by the oil company’s rules or you were offside. Never mind all the smiley propaganda about safety they put out, it was a hire and fire situation in the shipping world. Most were frightened to stand up and say so. Australia was a different ball game the master had more control and was due to the unions backing. Different unions different ball games also. Cheers JWS
Last edited by j.sabourn; 24th July 2018 at 02:15 PM.
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
24th July 2018, 01:48 PM
#4
Re: 6 on 6 off
I always said, ……………………"If Safety costs money, then forget it,".
as true today as it has always been.
Cheers
Brian
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
24th July 2018, 08:01 PM
#5
Re: 6 on 6 off

Originally Posted by
j.sabourn
Brian was even worse off shore , but that was the system, as master the rig or platform expected 18 hours from the master as regards shiphanldilng discharging and back loading. Did 26 hours once to comply with the rigs request. If you didn’t work in with their wishes you stood to lose the charter. Then going from the Brent field back into Lerwick thick fog. Sleep what is that, you either played by the oil company’s rules or you were offside. Never mind all the smiley propaganda about safety they put out, it was a hire and fire situation in the shipping world. Most were frightened to stand up and say so. Australia was a different ball game the master had more control and was due to the unions backing. Different unions different ball games also. Cheers JWS
John a rig shift was job and finish no matter how long it took. I think I posted this before. Start on the 19th Dec. three anchor handling vessels involved, two called off with various mechanical faults leaving us to carry on. Snatching an hour's sleep when we could Skipper on the bridge C/Eng. in the winch cab. Finished on 4th Jan. Christmas Dinner didn't taste the same in Jan.
Bill
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
24th July 2018, 08:35 PM
#6
Re: 6 on 6 off
Bill saw Peter Bloomer when over. He had been to Jakey Kerr’s funeral not too long ago. Believe he said he died with asbestosis. You may or may not know. Ref. Your. #5 what was the bonus again 5 pounds an anchor up or an anchor down. ??? Enough for a few pints in the 19th. Hole. What was the song ... were going well we’re going Shell, and the Zapata ships .. I doesn’t matter were with Zapata. Cheers JWS
Last edited by j.sabourn; 24th July 2018 at 08:55 PM.
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
25th July 2018, 06:10 AM
#7
Re: 6 on 6 off
One of the problems with modern day shipping I fear.
No one out there to control so what is to stop any skipper making his own rules while at sea, ban the 6 to 6 and what is to stop him from introducing something else.
he could always claim it was in the interest of the ship.
But as Brian said, costs are paramount top any shipping company and they will do anything to reduce them.
I have often wondered with some of the container ships how the crew manage, very few so little chance of any social interaction and time ashore is gone.


Happy daze John in Oz.
Life is too short to blend in.
John Strange R737787
World Traveller

-
25th July 2018, 04:25 PM
#8
Re: 6 on 6 off

Originally Posted by
j.sabourn
Bill saw Peter Bloomer when over. He had been to Jakey Kerr’s funeral not too long ago. Believe he said he died with asbestosis. You may or may not know. Ref. Your. #5 what was the bonus again 5 pounds an anchor up or an anchor down. ??? Enough for a few pints in the 19th. Hole. What was the song ... were going well we’re going Shell, and the Zapata ships .. I doesn’t matter were with Zapata. Cheers JWS
I worked for Zapata in 85 - out of Jebel Ali. I was amazed by how untrained the crews were and safety was virtually non existant (no extra pay for doing anything).
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
25th July 2018, 04:30 PM
#9
Re: 6 on 6 off

Originally Posted by
happy daze john in oz
One of the problems with modern day shipping I fear.
No one out there to control so what is to stop any skipper making his own rules while at sea, ban the 6 to 6 and what is to stop him from introducing something else.
he could always claim it was in the interest of the ship.
But as Brian said, costs are paramount top any shipping company and they will do anything to reduce them.
I have often wondered with some of the container ships how the crew manage, very few so little chance of any social interaction and time ashore is gone.
I once lightened a 250,000 ton KOC tanker who had so few men they could not muster foe n aft moring parties simultaneously, cook was even running up the deck, apron flapping
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
25th July 2018, 07:37 PM
#10
Re: 6 on 6 off
Hi John sailed with Pete a few times a great lad. I knew Jake Kerr had past away had been in touch with a friend of his on an other site. Jake was mate on the Conqueror with me for about eighteen months in the Seventies. Have photo of him posted about two years ago.
The anchor job was 1976/77. on the Champion with Jim Ormiston from Rothbury as Skipper. I found a copy of of the manning agreement in place that that time.
Alas John The 19th Hole & the Torry Bar are no more the whole area is being redeveloped and a new harbour being built in the Bay of Nigg.
Nice to know your are safe home in W.A. again. If life had been different I may well have ended up there, Albany. The Australian Government in the early 1950's bought some old Aberdeen steam trawlers and crews and families were offered the chance to relocate to Australia my father thought about it but stay put.
Regards Bill.
-
Post Thanks / Like
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules