By registering with our site you will have full instant access to:
268,000 posts on every subject imaginable contributed by 1000's of members worldwide.
25000 photos and videos mainly relating to the British Merchant Navy.
Members experienced in research to help you find out about friends and relatives who served.
The camaraderie of 1000's of ex Merchant Seamen who use the site for recreation & nostalgia.
Here we are all equal whether ex Deck Boy or Commodore of the Fleet.
A wealth of experience and expertise from all departments spanning 70+ years.
It is simple to register and membership is absolutely free.
N.B. If you are going to be requesting help from one of the forums with finding historical details of a relative
please include as much information as possible to help members assist you. We certainly need full names,
date and place of birth / death where possible plus any other details you have such as discharge book numbers etc.
Please post all questions onto the appropriate forum
As I feel there are quite a few on here that have NOT updated their Email addresses, can you please do so. It is of importance that your Email is current, so as we can contact you if applicable . Send me the details in my Private Message Box.
Thank You Doc Vernon
Please log in with your username and password
-
18th June 2013, 03:40 PM
#11
Like the builders, MOL and NK have good reputations.
It happens in the best of families.
Credit to the rescuers.
-
18th June 2013, 06:32 PM
#12
These incidents are accidents waiting to happen. Have long held the view that continuous loading discharging of these ships must
introduce a weakness BM's and SF's maybe OK at the time but say a complete discharge and then reload of a bay while the
adjacent bay stays untouched then done 10-12 times a year for 5 years must create weak areas.
-
18th June 2013, 10:02 PM
#13
Container ship breaks in half
Wikipedia have all the details, and the Ships, she is a a big lump, too big for Panama Canal, built of special Steel, Over 1000 feet long.

Tony Wilding
-
18th June 2013, 11:26 PM
#14
Steel
Forget what year it was but a long time ago when hearing about the scantlings on new buildings being reduced due to the new types of paint and anti corrosives used in shipbuilding and such things. Steelwork on modern shipping never seemed to me to have the robustness of older tonnage. John Sabourn
-
19th June 2013, 03:34 AM
#15
Container ship breaks in half
every ship i worked on was constructed with rivets, those ships did not crack, the liberty ships did and it needed bands of rivets to stop it, maybe these monsters need the same preventive measures. From what i read on our site of cracks on ore and oil carriers, it happens too often. Box boats also. Maybe they are built to an incorrect formula , too much movement. Titanic was nigh on vertical befor she snapped.

Tony Wilding
-
19th June 2013, 04:22 AM
#16
Rivets/Welds
Tony I too sailed on riveted ships in the 50's. It was talked about among the seafaring communities of that era that rivets were better than welds. However from its first introduction welding has advanced in the general principles of and will probably now find is stronger in shipbuilding than a riveted hull and this is probably the concensus of opinion today. When a crack appeared around a rivet the only way you could hope to arrest was by drilling a hole at the end of the crack in the hope of arresting it advancing. Most ships carry welding plants now and many jobs around the ship are done with such, have even tried myself but found I had problems keeping the rod the correct distance from the weld, everyone to his own trade. For serious welding of certain parts of a ship a certificated welder has to be used as like most things some have to be done by professional people, believe they are called graded welders or something like that. A ships engineer would be more advanced on this subject than most of us. Regards John Sabourn
-
19th June 2013, 05:26 AM
#17
The most common standard to my understanding in the American one ASME 9 http://www.gowelding.com/wp/asme.htmIt is my belief that most shipbuilding welds now would be machine welds done automatically and to a high standard , I know the early welds done in the 1940s had quality problems. Caused by poor welds , and incorrect procedures ,
Rob Page R855150 - British & Commonwealth Shipping ( 1965 - 1973 ) Gulf Oil -( 1973 - 1975 ) Sealink ( 1975 - 1986 ) 

-
19th June 2013, 06:24 AM
#18
Container ship breaks in half
it seems no matter how big ships are built, in the end the sea has the last word, am convinced ship designers have no real ideas of sea conditions. Impossible to simulate in a tank with a model, have seen many models afloat, all look good untill underway, then its a giveaway, wave and wash formations all out of scale, cant scale down the density of water in relation to the model, so how can tank testing be accurate, ? My opinion is ships have become too big, still are, latest mearsk box boats, then bigger ones will be built, and so it goes on, cruise ships the same. Lucky this one broke where she did, much further aft and that end would become unstable, very lucky no loss of life, the sea conditions were not extreme, another problem with box boats is reliance on given weights of containers, no checks appear to be made, surely it would be possible for the loading crane to be able to measure each lift against the manifest weight , ? It was stated she could have been in a hogged condition befor she sailed, too much reliance on shippers declarations. Spot checks should be made on weights. More events like this will happen, i hope both halves make port, maybe some answers then.

Tony Wilding
-
19th June 2013, 06:43 AM
#19
Do such ships still have expansion plates? I know most of the cruisae ships do but not sure about containers. But the fact both hlaves are still aflost the majority of the ship must have been well built.


Happy daze John in Oz.
Life is too short to blend in.
John Strange R737787
World Traveller

-
19th June 2013, 06:51 AM
#20
Welding
Remember one ship I was on going from Honolulu to South Korea. During heavy weather one of the derrick crutches carried away and a section of handrails distorted and welds broken. The master was on the point of retiring and had been on the Liner trade all his life. He said to me he had sent a cable to the owners and told me he expected a superintendant out from the uk to see to the repairs. I told him that was not the way the company worked. The answer came back to tell the mate to arrange shore labour and to advice them the costs after job completed. The master was a nice old bloke but as have suggested the difference the way some ships were run in different posts, he couldn't get his head round the H.K. articles bit. After arriving in Seoul he came to my cabin to say cheerio as he was off home, this was out of the blue. He said I have waited 50 years to be able to do this and off he went. I carried on with the repairs and first offered the engineers (Indian) the job, which they didn't want so hired shore labour which was coppers and was only minor repairs. After South Korea I took the ship to Japan and told the owners to arrange another master. In those days I was not looking for promotion as preferred to play the field.As regards welding I don't think I have ever sailed with European seagoing engineers where there wasn't at least one of them who could weld, and if not most would give it a bash.Cheers John Sabourn
Similar Threads
-
By happy daze john in oz in forum Swinging the Lamp
Replies: 18
Last Post: 1st July 2014, 08:11 PM
-
By Keith Tindell in forum Merchant Navy General Postings
Replies: 17
Last Post: 9th February 2014, 06:41 AM
-
By gray_marian in forum Trivia and Interesting Stuff
Replies: 16
Last Post: 24th January 2014, 04:22 PM
-
By Captain Kong in forum Merchant Navy General Postings
Replies: 42
Last Post: 1st December 2011, 05:40 AM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules