Re: Euthanasia
I agree with you John that as long as a breath in their body that they should strive to keep going and not advocating that it be any different. Therein lies the difference between us. We who want euthenasia made legal are not advocating that it become compulsary and those that do not want it have every legal right to not have it imposed upon them. One example I have in mind is my brother in law who for a long while was thinking of quitting life because of the problems he was having and his doctor was doing all he could to keep him going. Then he changed doctors to find out that the medication that he was on was excessive and the new doctor sorted it all out. Result that he lived many years more once medication was altered. So the arguments go back and forth with so many re arranged truths from both camps to push their own agenda. My point is that one can be relying upon doctors to keep you going but who knows if they are correct in their diagnosis, This is a case against what I believe in but still think that I want it legal to end my life if I so wish. Suicide may seem like a cowards way out but there are many reasons why it is not successful. If deciding to take pills ones body could end up rejecting them and you vomit them out hence why they recomend that you take medication to reduce the affect of vomiting before taking medication to end life. If one decides to suck on the exhaust pipe and someone comes along the chances are that they will stop it and no one can blame them as it should not be on their conscience either. But this could leave one with brain damage. There are numurous reasons as to why trying to commit end of life is fraught with failure that will leave one worse of. Maybe the only way is two ounces of lead or that fatal leap of the cliff or tall building which leaves a mess for the family to come to terms with. Personally would like to explain to the family why I am doing it and leave this mortal coil peacefully in my own home or hospital. Not being selfish just realistic in the fact that everything ends without undue trauma. Just one more point about an argument against it. What if the family are only interested in getting their hands on the inheritance and what you gone. Well if I thought that about my kids then there is no way that I want to hang around with them any more either. Just think of the ultimate revenge of not leaving them anything. No it is not a case stopping them changing the law just the fact that they are relying upon archaic religious rules to do absolutly nothing in case they loose a vote or two.
That's the way the mop flops.
My thanks to Brian for this site.