Prince Charles Private Letters

Jim is a typical example of our modern day media. They like to target the famous and the vulnerable, they are like vultures around any calamity and are quick to spot the most likely one to succumb to their blandishments for what they consider a top story. When one hits back they fall back on the old phrase, Freedom of the Press, what a crock of crap, some of them are a disgrace to their so called profession. As said once before we now in these enlightened times can hit back by these electronic means, unfortuanetly the likes of Prince Charles is severely restricted in doing so. I hope others have taken note of the actions of the paper responsible and take action and tell them their thoughts on the subject. Second rate newspaper reporting and shows the inaccuracy of a lot of what is published. Cheers JS PS in other words pure and undiluted S---e stirring. JS

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Louis the fly

For some strange reason known only to yourself Cappy you appear to obsessed with unions. This thread began with royalty and my observation that Charlie could finance a hospital. No other person contributing to the debate has mentioned unions as they have nothing to do with the subject in question.
No matter what the subject of a persons post is you continue to bring it around to your own prejudices.

---

my dislike for unions is based on my seeing the disorder they have caused ......your dislike seems to be of anyone who got off the bottom and did something .....in one of your recent whinges you were on about ....touching your forelock.......dont know anyone whodoes that ...but you carry on ...ps did you google the princes trust and see what charles actually does or did you not bother....which is probably the case .....to each his own louis ...cappy off to shields for the day .....and we all no what the unions did to the tyne

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cappy

my dislike for unions is based on my seeing the disorder they have caused ......your dislike seems to be of anyone who got off the bottom and did something .....in one of your recent whinges you were on about ....touching your forelock.......dont know anyone whodoes that ...but you carry on ...ps did you google the princes trust and see what charles actually does or did you not bother....which is probably the case .....to each his own louis ...cappy off to shields for the day .....and we all no what the unions did to the tyne

---

#42 Would that I had a forelock to touch- not had one since Bill Hailey was a lad.

Perhaps when you get back you will have something more interesting to say instead of bleating on about the same old subject we have heard time after time.
Please take the time to read what the posts are before voicing an opinion.

Not called a forelock now John. Its a dreadlock. JS

Just an aside to this post. I caught the tail end of a news summary the other day, with a statement that one of the reporters jailed in Egypt re all the hue and cry by Al Jazeera as being innocent etc. etc. was suing Al Jazeera itself for something about his imprisonment. Anyone follow up on the story ??? JS

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gray_marian

#34, 'grog, women, smokes and sadly some I wasted on silly things such as clothes and food.'

In that order John?:p

---

But of course, you have a drink while waiting for the lady to arrive and a smoke after.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Louis the fly

Perhaps when you get back you will have something more interesting to say instead of bleating on about the same old subject we have heard time after time.
Please take the time to read what the posts are before voicing an opinion.

---

louis i am trying to keep to your rule ........its about as you say prince charles .....well he wont be able to use the royal train on bank holiday......cos the rail union is going on strike....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cappy

louis i am trying to keep to your rule ........its about as you say prince charles .....well he wont be able to use the royal train on bank holiday......cos the rail union is going on strike....

---

As a matter of interest the CEO Network Rail is paid £675.000 p.a.he has just been awarded an £80.000 p.a. raise do you think this has got the workers a bit discontent over their money.???? (Cappys view "He deserves every penny)
Regards.
Jim.B.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jim Brady

As a matter of interest the CEO Network Rail is paid £675.000 p.a.he has just been awarded an £80.000 p.a. raise do you think this has got the workers a bit discontent over their money.???? (Cappys view "He deserves every penny)
Regards.
Jim.B.

---

####its called supply and demand jim........compared to a footballer......its peanuts ....you must have people capable of running these operations ....why does he command that money .....if the capitalist bosses are such ogres why would they pay this if they could get the right calibre of man cheaper........he can be sacked ....i have never heard of a union boss been sacked in my life......but many big company chiefs fall by the wayside ......asda mand s morrisons.......oh and milliband the only people i know who have jobs for life are the royals and the union chiefs .....unless they are actually caught......fiddling......regards cappy