Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: New sub

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    5,749
    Thanks (Given)
    485
    Thanks (Received)
    3572
    Likes (Given)
    2436
    Likes (Received)
    15362

    Default New sub

    the government has said the new sub is allready 2billion over budget the keel isn't even laid yet? who is in charge of the costing?jp

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Waterlooville Hampshire UK
    Posts
    6,936
    Thanks (Given)
    1693
    Thanks (Received)
    3691
    Likes (Given)
    3684
    Likes (Received)
    13355

    Default

    I have done some work occasionally with people who supply the MoD and I would say that they do not live in the same World as the rest of us , no one seems to ever check on them , look at the carriers , who in their right mind would ever build a ship in three shipyards geographically 500 miles apart
    Rob Page R855150 - British & Commonwealth Shipping ( 1965 - 1973 ) Gulf Oil -( 1973 - 1975 ) Sealink ( 1975 - 1986 )

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Cardiff and the World
    Posts
    1,845
    Thanks (Given)
    332
    Thanks (Received)
    428
    Likes (Given)
    3389
    Likes (Received)
    1438

    Default Dont buy it 2nd hand off the Chinese

    Hi shipmates, do you want the latest in technology on the Sub, or a pice of worthless junk? that can be sunk by a boffin on a lap-top. You pays your money and you get a proper sub, with a few years of service life. for few billion more? I would not buy one. but spend the money on Hospitals and ex merchant seamans welfare.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Torquay
    Posts
    11,740
    Thanks (Given)
    3478
    Thanks (Received)
    8028
    Likes (Given)
    12072
    Likes (Received)
    35934

    Default M o d

    Quote Originally Posted by robpage View Post
    I have done some work occasionally with people who supply the MoD and I would say that they do not live in the same World as the rest of us , no one seems to ever check on them , look at the carriers , who in their right mind would ever build a ship in three shipyards geographically 500 miles apart
    Supplied goods to the M O D when I had my own company, they are very late payers, so you have to inflate your prices to cover the cost of financing the M o D, if they got their payment systems together and paid within 15/30 days instead of 9/12 months they could purchase more with the same money. But as everything has to go through various departments to get numerous signatures so that no one person is to blame if something goes wrong, then suppliers 'have' to inflate prices to cover loans they need to pay their own staff. I doubt anything much has changed and I suspect it's even a longer process now.

    I found no financial benefit being on their approved contractors list, probably if you were dealing in multi million pound projects it may be different, as the Banks are not going to let you down when you have a large Government project in hand.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Waterlooville Hampshire UK
    Posts
    6,936
    Thanks (Given)
    1693
    Thanks (Received)
    3691
    Likes (Given)
    3684
    Likes (Received)
    13355

    Default

    The MoD themselves seem to have appointed main contractors to organise everything , and the main contractors are employing the same numpty that did the job as the MoD , They make a great show of everything being transparent , but I after a recent experience have my doubts , It is not worth the pain of dealing with them , so they get left with contractors who charge them for the privilege of dealing with them .
    Rob Page R855150 - British & Commonwealth Shipping ( 1965 - 1973 ) Gulf Oil -( 1973 - 1975 ) Sealink ( 1975 - 1986 )

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Long Eaton
    Posts
    5,558
    Thanks (Given)
    803
    Thanks (Received)
    5873
    Likes (Given)
    15834
    Likes (Received)
    17831

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by robpage View Post
    I have done some work occasionally with people who supply the MoD and I would say that they do not live in the same World as the rest of us , no one seems to ever check on them , look at the carriers , who in their right mind would ever build a ship in three shipyards geographically 500 miles apart
    Golden ********.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    4,607
    Thanks (Given)
    2087
    Thanks (Received)
    3356
    Likes (Given)
    10815
    Likes (Received)
    12764

    Default Food for thought

    Did you know that right through the cold war period, Most NATO Countries warships had very limited compatibility with each other example, The French Navy, and the Royal Navy used completely different fire hose fittings on deck and, In the event of fire helping each other out theres were useless aboard our ships and visa versa, It wasn't only France, A lot of U.S. Vessels had little or no compatibility with the rest of European warships. Seen even today as the most powerful defence against Russia and world peace. There is a lot of joined up writing that has not been put into place. Regards lads Terry.
    {terry scouse}

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Sunbury Victoria Australia
    Posts
    26,146
    Thanks (Given)
    9409
    Thanks (Received)
    10576
    Likes (Given)
    111822
    Likes (Received)
    47646

    Default

    Not only UK has a depratment of stupidity, we have them here as well. New warship, hull built in Spain and brought out here on a barge to be completed. Then the feral gov tells us they may have to close the only shipyard we have here in Melbourne as there is not enough demand for new ships.?????????
    Who breeds these plonkers???????????
    Happy daze John in Oz.

    Life is too short to blend in.

    John Strange R737787
    World Traveller

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Waterlooville Hampshire UK
    Posts
    6,936
    Thanks (Given)
    1693
    Thanks (Received)
    3691
    Likes (Given)
    3684
    Likes (Received)
    13355

    Default

    The Labour government did not want to upset the unions so they used three shipyards to share the work , funny I think one of them is in Gordon Brown's constituency , this is not reality it is Politics , The ned for four trident subs ws explained to me by an ex-Royal Navy man , as one is at sea , one is going out , one is coming in , and the other one is either on refit or broken down .
    Rob Page R855150 - British & Commonwealth Shipping ( 1965 - 1973 ) Gulf Oil -( 1973 - 1975 ) Sealink ( 1975 - 1986 )

  10. #10
    leratty's Avatar
    leratty Guest

    Default

    In regards gov't contracts it has ever been so. Once experienced as small to medium biz you stay away. In Oz at end of financial year they, all dept's, go out & spend whatever they have not in last years budget as if they don't they get what they saved deducted from new years budget, they just buy anything to get rid of it how NUTS is that? Has anyone ever come across a civil servant who has any concept of responsible management or budgeting? Never it is a bottomless pit for them 'why worry always more where that came from.' My father used to say it was a government plot to employ the unemployable.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •