By registering with our site you will have full instant access to:
268,000 posts on every subject imaginable contributed by 1000's of members worldwide.
25000 photos and videos mainly relating to the British Merchant Navy.
Members experienced in research to help you find out about friends and relatives who served.
The camaraderie of 1000's of ex Merchant Seamen who use the site for recreation & nostalgia.
Here we are all equal whether ex Deck Boy or Commodore of the Fleet.
A wealth of experience and expertise from all departments spanning 70+ years.
It is simple to register and membership is absolutely free.
N.B. If you are going to be requesting help from one of the forums with finding historical details of a relative
please include as much information as possible to help members assist you. We certainly need full names,
date and place of birth / death where possible plus any other details you have such as discharge book numbers etc.
Please post all questions onto the appropriate forum

-
27th June 2023, 08:35 AM
#71
Re: Submersible missing

Originally Posted by
Tony Taylor
good friend of mine was mate on one of the sisterships, cant recall the name now, but he said they were regularly having it welded it up. Was frame 69 or something? Did you ever run across Terry Wright?
I know the one he is talking about as i worked for Cast at the time. It was at frame 65 ( cofferdam ) .
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
27th June 2023, 09:39 AM
#72
Re: Submersible missing
Not exactly the builders finest hour, 6 built two sank. The first of the class was the Furness Bridge and the only one built to the original design she was in service for 21 years being scrapped in 1992.
Strange how the two vessels built for Bibby Line both sank and the newest one was the first to sink.
English Bridge renamed Worcestershire and at the time of her sinking/grounding she was the Kowloon Bridge in 1986.
Liverpool Bridge later named Derbyshire.
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
27th June 2023, 09:53 AM
#73
Re: Submersible missing
Should have said earlier the sister ship I was on was the Sir John Hunter, later renamed the Cast Kittiwake and then Kona. I was on it with the three different names. While I was on it as the Kona a few guys joined after being told it was a new ship to the company only to find out it was the renamed SJH which they had been on before. The ship was not that bad but being a large OBO hardly any runs up the road, apart from 4 weeks in Ulsan drydock which was goood fun.
Senior Member
UK003715
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
27th June 2023, 10:49 PM
#74
Re: Submersible missing
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
28th June 2023, 01:20 AM
#75
Re: Submersible missing
Hi John.
Moping oil on the deck was used a lot on some ships I was on, plus the long handled scraper, beat chipping hands down. The Mates never had to worry when we were greasing the blocks or oiling the runners,as the more that went on the deck the better they liked it.
Des
R510868
Lest We Forget
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
29th June 2023, 04:33 AM
#76
Re: Submersible missing
Latest news, some of the wreckage from 40,000 feet down has been recovered by the Canadian navy.
From that they hope to establish what happened.
There are also what they think may be human remains as well.


Happy daze John in Oz.
Life is too short to blend in.
John Strange R737787
World Traveller

-
Post Thanks / Like
-
29th June 2023, 11:08 PM
#77
Re: Submersible missing
John 40,000 feet !!! that would be over 3 times deeper than the Titanic rests
-
30th June 2023, 02:23 AM
#78
Re: Submersible missing
#76. Certainly out of the realms of the patent sounding machine John. Boyle’s law not applicable in this case . Shame though as the makers of glass tubes and the suppliers of yellow chromate stood to make a fortune . JS .
Last edited by j.sabourn; 30th June 2023 at 02:27 AM.
R575129
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
30th June 2023, 06:26 AM
#79
Re: Submersible missing
That should read James as about 4 kilometers or around 13200 feet imperial.
Got the original from a news item.


Happy daze John in Oz.
Life is too short to blend in.
John Strange R737787
World Traveller

-
Post Thanks / Like
-
30th June 2023, 09:23 AM
#80
Re: Submersible missing
It is all this metric malarkey John, enough to confuse those who never grew up with SI units someone made a reference to 10,000 metres the other day. Somethings do sound better when you mention centre metres when comparing things to inches.
I remember sailing on a few ships that had Sulzer engines. They had certain parts on those engines that used imperial threaded bolts but mostly they were Metric threads.
If in the wrong hands sometimes could prove to be very dangerous.
I was on a Bibby LPG carrier that had a Doxford engine. Some one had fitted a main engine relief valve using a whitworth stud into the engine casing but used a metric nut to tighten the valve in place. The valve was blown off the engine and embbeded in the main switch board. This valve weighed probably 10kgs, so 22lbs or a stone and a 1/2 in old money. It just missed the chief engineer, mind you he was heavy handed on the Air and fuel when trying to start the engine. Best guy on the sticks was usually the 3rd. I could start a Doxford on a whisper of air as long as it was an ahead movement, going astern was a different matter.
Last edited by James Curry; 30th June 2023 at 09:26 AM.
-
Post Thanks / Like
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules