By registering with our site you will have full instant access to:
268,000 posts on every subject imaginable contributed by 1000's of members worldwide.
25000 photos and videos mainly relating to the British Merchant Navy.
Members experienced in research to help you find out about friends and relatives who served.
The camaraderie of 1000's of ex Merchant Seamen who use the site for recreation & nostalgia.
Here we are all equal whether ex Deck Boy or Commodore of the Fleet.
A wealth of experience and expertise from all departments spanning 70+ years.
It is simple to register and membership is absolutely free.
N.B. If you are going to be requesting help from one of the forums with finding historical details of a relative
please include as much information as possible to help members assist you. We certainly need full names,
date and place of birth / death where possible plus any other details you have such as discharge book numbers etc.
Please post all questions onto the appropriate forum

-
15th February 2025, 09:22 AM
#1
USS Harry Trueman v Besiktas-M
Things that go bump in the night. USS Harry Trueman hits Merchant ship Besiktas-M. Thankfully no reported injuries. I wonder what the story is there. Curious though as to how a Merchant ship could get that close to a Carrier. There are usually 4 other surface ships in a carrier group. So how come a foriegn Merchant Ship got that close?
Found this on Vesseltracke.com
Collision with aircraft carrier
Fri Feb 14 08:59:16 CET 2025 Timsen
The aircraft carrier USS 'Harry S. Truman' (MMSI: 368800000) was involved in collision with the 'Besiktas M' near Port Said on Feb 12, 2025, at around 11:46 p.m., while both ships were moving. The collision took place between the entrance/exit of the Suez Canal and the vessel traffic separation to the northwest. None of the crews' were injured. The 'Harry S. Truman', which is based in Norfolk, Virginia, deployed in September to the Mediterranean and the Middle East. It had just completed a port call in Souda Bay and was heading towards the Suez Canal with an escort destroyer. Both ships had their AIS turned off. The 'Besiktas M', which had been en route from Aqaba to Constanta, and which had sustained damage to its starboard bow and deck, initially dropped anchor in pos. 31° 16' N 032° 22' E, but continued its voyage to Constanta on Feb 14 with an ETA as of Feb 18. US military officials have not confirmed whether the collision will delay the aircraft carriers 's expected onward movement to its next destination.
Report with photo and video:
https://gcaptain.com/aircraft-carrie...ear-port-said/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqRe-ouavjw
Collision off Chittagong
Fri Aug 26 11:28:57 CEST 2016 Timsen
The "Besiktas M" was in collision with the Bulkcarrier "Common Spirit" at Chittagong anchorage in the evening of Aug 23, 2016. Both vessels were damaged. The extent of damages and collision details were unknown.
If the Besiktas was exiting the canal North bound and the Harry Trueman is South bound? Last time I was through the Canal on an LNG Gas Carrier nothing moved until we entered the canal or we were tail end Charlie. Always remember it was like Wacky Races as soon as you cleared the canal. Box boats going for it lol. Even the Gas Carriers I was on could clip on at 20 knots +
Last edited by James Curry; 15th February 2025 at 09:37 AM.
-
15th February 2025, 10:20 AM
#2
Re: USS Harry Trueman v Besiktas-M
With the number of USN vessels colliding with merchant ships in recent years it can be down to a couple of things, arrogance of USN naval navigators thinking they always have the right of way, or incompetence in underestimating the speed of merchant ships even though they have up to date True Motion Radar, but because of naval heirachy separate men on the radar and physical bearings and chain of communication to the decision maker there are time lapses which can be ill afforded when each vessel is approaching at a speed in excess of 15knots with merchant vessels having bluff bows and single screws and not the luxury of manouverability of naval vessels, a factor that many naval men of all nations (apparently) do not take into consideration when putting themselves in a close quarters situation.
Always remember a USN Carrier flashing another observed light, ' This is USN vessel XYZ, if you do not alter course we will open fire as you are impeding our progress' to which the reply was received 'if you do not alter course your progress WILL be impeded as this is ABC lighthouse'
Last edited by Ivan Cloherty; 15th February 2025 at 10:30 AM.
-
Post Thanks / Like
-
15th February 2025, 10:38 AM
#3
Re: USS Harry Trueman v Besiktas-M
Used to get buzzed by Naval ships when leaving the Gulf . Due to the risk of Piracy it was not unusual to turn off the AIS until clear of high risk areas. One that still sticks in my mind was a US warship demanding the vessel in position such & such , course , speed and ships name. And why was the AIS turned off? Old man gave the reason and as there was no longer any point he turned the AIS back on. He also told the Naval vessel as there was no longer any need to remain dark so to speak as they navy ship had just told the world around us who we were and corse , speed and position. Silence from the navy.
-
Post Thanks / Like
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules