By registering with our site you will have full instant access to:
268,000 posts on every subject imaginable contributed by 1000's of members worldwide.
25000 photos and videos mainly relating to the British Merchant Navy.
Members experienced in research to help you find out about friends and relatives who served.
The camaraderie of 1000's of ex Merchant Seamen who use the site for recreation & nostalgia.
Here we are all equal whether ex Deck Boy or Commodore of the Fleet.
A wealth of experience and expertise from all departments spanning 70+ years.
It is simple to register and membership is absolutely free.
N.B. If you are going to be requesting help from one of the forums with finding historical details of a relative
please include as much information as possible to help members assist you. We certainly need full names,
date and place of birth / death where possible plus any other details you have such as discharge book numbers etc.
Please post all questions onto the appropriate forum

-
24th February 2011, 10:04 PM
#1
Flatirons
Does anyone remember the Flatties that used to sail all the way up the Thames,the funnel had to be dropped every time you went under a bridge,i never sailed on one myself but my older brother did and he told about them.I had seen them in blyth and went aboard one in Dunston.PHIL
-
24th February 2011, 10:54 PM
#2
Flatirons

Originally Posted by
philipmthompson
Does anyone remember the Flatties that used to sail all the way up the Thames,the funnel had to be dropped every time you went under a bridge,i never sailed on one myself but my older brother did and he told about them.I had seen them in blyth and went aboard one in Dunston.PHIL
Hi Phil
I was 2/m on the steam flatiron "Hackney" in the 1950's, now they were something different when in the North sea in bad weather, because you were navigating from deck level (no bridge), you were always facing a wall of water. You could see ahead when they were loaded, but in ballast the bow rode high and you couldn't see right ahead of you - made navigating interesting especially as they were 11 and 12 knotters.
It was an interesting experience going under all the Thames bridges with inches to spare, the tall funnel(steam) was on pivots and had to be pulled down approaching every bridge and raised again after passing under the bridge otherwise the engine room filled with smoke. We always got covered in soot when the funnel was down whilst we were on standby aft all the way up the river
During daylight transits the masts could be lowered (on pivots) and kept down until clear of all bridges. On night transits the masts as well as the funnel had to be raised and lowered for every bridge because of mast navigation lights, couldn't get a concession to sail with only port and starboard lights showing, foremast and mainmast lights had to be shown, it made it hard work for all on board, as all hands were needed, these masts and funnel were not lightweight, had to be winched down, but the masts had cantilever weights on the bottom and could be eased back up into position.
They were run by CEGB and Stevie Clarkes, all were under management of Stevies, all good feeders and good crews, if I remember rightly the dwt was about 2300 tonnes which meant two tides alongside at Battersea Power Station. Cannot remember the name of the local watering hole, but we got some funny looks went we went ashore covered in coal dust in one of the nicer parts of town. Only having an hour for stevedores break there wasn't time to get washed and changed.
With the steam engine aft and our accommodation midships to for'ard, it was very quiet and was like being on a sailing ship, with only the sound of the water against the hull, no throb throb of the motor ships, glorious in one respect, but when manouevering a steam ship you have to think far ahead as they didn't have the immediate propeller response of the motor ships, some times waiting for "full astern" when you rung it to activate could be an underpant changing moment before the prop responded and bit into the water.
Memories-------------what would we do without them
Regards
Ivan
-
25th February 2011, 01:46 AM
#3
Different indeed!
Hello Ivan
Nice little writup of your time with the Flatiron "Hackney" as you say,they were very different!
Here is a Pic of that old Flatiron,well i think it must be the same one you sailed with!
Cheers
http://www.photoship.co.uk/JAlbum%20...ackney-01.html
Dont know if this one is also classed as a Flatiron, (it says Cargo)but also seems to have no superstructure! ??
Photo of the cargo vessel Tarring (IMO 5202916) seen off Avonmouth, England in 1980. This vessel has a remarkable design: the superstructure seems to be missing almost completely. Looking at the funnel I am sure she was designed this way but it can't be easy to navigate her as you can't see anything from the 'bridge'.
The 1877 tons cargo vessel Tarring was built as GBR registered Lambeth in 1958 by Hall Russell, Aberdeen, Scotland. The Lambeth changed name in 1970 to Tarring, in 1980 to Arring and in 1982 to Tarry. She was scrapped in 1984 at Liverpool, England.
Model of another Flattie!
Last edited by Doc Vernon; 25th February 2011 at 02:08 AM.
Senior Site Moderator-Member and Friend of this Website
R697530
-
25th February 2011, 04:37 AM
#4
-
25th February 2011, 09:12 AM
#5
Flatirons
[QUOTE=Castleman;54277]Hello Ivan
Nice little writup of your time with the Flatiron "Hackney" as you say,they were very different!
Here is a Pic of that old Flatiron,well i think it must be the same one you sailed with!
Cheers
Hi Vernon
Yes that's my old lady on photoship
The other photos and models are of the motor ship versions, with only the masts to worry about on the river transit, mind you, you did get gassed instead of sooted ! when on river stations.
They were converted later to cargo carriers and some ended up as cement carriers and a lot ended up in the Medi with the Greeks.
One thing they had in common with having no high accommodation was good stability, also having no accommodation housing(especially on the motor ships with no funnel) was a drawback wondering whether or not the other ships approaching you had actually seen you. At least on the steamers they could see this funnel floating along the ocean and that certainly got their attention.
It always seemed strange when boarding that you went down into the bridge and accommodation rather than up into it, when you went back on a normal ship it felt like you were on top of the Effiel Tower (well sort of!)
As said previously they were a bugger to navigate in ballast as your photo shows when you look at it, all you see is your own ship and very little else, but kept you fit on the bridge going from P to S and back again all the time. Interesting times
Regards
Ivan
-
25th February 2011, 11:56 AM
#6
Those glorious Flatirons !
I sailed on two Flatiron tankers in the 60's, my first stints as Second Mate. We ran up and down the Thames from Canvey Island to various power Stations, and worked day and night for 3 round trips, when we loaded and went to Greenhithe buoys for 24 hours to catch upo on lost sleep. This was my best ever schooling in pilotage, and I remember it fondly. The food was excellent and they were great little ships to load and discharge, with a simple "Ring Main" pipeline system. We also had fun sculling the jolly boat ashore, some times ending up nearly at Gravesend, until the tide slacked off! I learned a lot about busy River navigation and ship handling which I would never have gained "Deepsea". happy days.Attachment 4171
Attachment 4172
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules