
Originally Posted by
Rodney Mills
The point the "Economist" was making was not about all people from different lands abusing the N.H.S.. It was about roughly 2.2 million E.U. East European legal residents in the U.K. and their impact (cost) to the U.K. and comparing it to 2 million British retirees who are legal residents in Spain: No one else. Ozzies, mozzies, Afghanis, uncle Tom Cobble (sp?) and all not included. The comparison being that the legal residents from Eastern Europe are in the main, young and healthy and do not constitute a drain on the British health system. The legal British residents are, in the main, retirees and much older...most are in our membership's age and consequently have (a) on going age related illnesses: diabetes, heart, rheumatism, etc. etc. (b) the likelihood of contracting these and other age related illnesses; consequently, the costs are far greater to Spain in this (this only) example.
The second point the article raised, was that should the U.K. disallow reciprocal medical service to these Eastern E.U. countries, or should the U.K. leave the E.U.. Then the "Enquirer" raised the question what is the effect to the British political party that do this, possibly risking the votes of 2 million British retirees, and what would happen when Spain retaliates by disallowing "free" medical services to the British retirees living in Spain. Bearing in mind that if the 2 million British retirees would want to continue living in Spain, they would have to (a) return to the U.K. or pay Spanish doctors, clinics, hospitals, etc. or (b) take out expensive medical insurance with most having pre-existing medical conditions.
It was a point of view that I had never thought of. The impact on "wrinklies" lapping up the sun and wine in Espana and possible loosing their "free" medical coverage.
Please don't shoot the messenger. I follow your posts on the political, cost of living, hospitals, E.U., Scotland in or out because I find and found the subjects interesting. Often confusing at times, as a poster will whinge on one post and praise the same subject on another post, but then that's life.
I do not take a position for or against any of the fore-mentioned subjects, though born in England 77 years ago, I have been gone for 57 years. I had many business visits from 1976-85, and many vacation trips to England, Scotland, Wales, and Eire and thoroughly enjoyed them; however, my last visit was in 1993. In no way am I, or was I, as a businessman and later a tourist qualified to pass judgment on your systems. But I'm conjoined at the hip with you all through a love of the sea and our mutual service in "the late British Merchant Navy."
So I ask you, don't read into the article what isn't there, and don't shoot the messenger as I can always cherry-pick and send you "softies and cream puff" pieces, but I doubt if they will peak your interest or help your mind to stay fit.
Cheers, Rodney
"Daring ideas are like chessmen moved forward. They may be beaten, but they may start a winning game."
—Goethe