By registering with our site you will have full instant access to:
268,000 posts on every subject imaginable contributed by 1000's of members worldwide.
25000 photos and videos mainly relating to the British Merchant Navy.
Members experienced in research to help you find out about friends and relatives who served.
The camaraderie of 1000's of ex Merchant Seamen who use the site for recreation & nostalgia.
Here we are all equal whether ex Deck Boy or Commodore of the Fleet.
A wealth of experience and expertise from all departments spanning 70+ years.
It is simple to register and membership is absolutely free.
N.B. If you are going to be requesting help from one of the forums with finding historical details of a relative
please include as much information as possible to help members assist you. We certainly need full names,
date and place of birth / death where possible plus any other details you have such as discharge book numbers etc.
Please post all questions onto the appropriate forum

-
12th February 2012, 06:48 PM
#1
Starved dog
HI, can any knowledgeable person explain why ships of welded construction have that starved dog look, hull sides never look flush, you can see every frame,
? ? ?
-
12th February 2012, 08:53 PM
#2
Starved dog
WEll Tony
No doubt someone will come up with some thermo dynamics and metallurgical physics to give you the scientific answer; but in short when I used to supervise hull repairs, the plate offered up was always perfect, but during the welding process, which was always started at both ends of the plate at the same time. The heat from the welding machine/torch is transferred to the plate, which when offered up was perfect, but as the heat had nowhere to go it transferred into the plate changing the characteristics, mostly expansion of course, when the plate cooled down it had what appeared to a rippled effect this was further accentuated when the other ribs were welded to the plate internally, and also the effect was more pronounced because the plates were thinner than on riveted ships, advances having been made in steel strengths. Had the older ships been welded rather than riveted then the rippling effect "may not" have occured, but the alternative argument is that because the plates were thicker, more welding would have been required hence more prolonged heat would have been incurred by the plates and may have caused some rippling. Even ships coming off the stocks these days look as if they have been having continuous arguments with the dockside. A weld is very strong, it is very rare for a weld to break, it is invariably the steel in close proximity to the weld that shatters, which is why it is prudent to have half plates along the hull strakes so that you do not get a continuous run of weld running round the hull, which is what used to happen to the war built assembly line Liberty ships which had a tendency to fracture just for'ard of the bridge housing.
Hope this helps but someone will be able to give you a scientific explanation, I can only speak from my dealings with shipyards and foreman shipwrights who were resonsible for the plating activities
Regards Ivan
-
12th February 2012, 11:17 PM
#3
Thanks for the info, i know Liberties cracked, as you say just forward of the bridge, also on hatch corners, in Mitchell and Sawers book Liberty Ships it states most cracked in ice conditions , arctic circle trips, it became brittle at low temperatures, they changed the type of steel used and it helped lessen that problem, also many had a rivetted extra band of steel from around fwd of no 2 hatch to aft of no 4 hatch, just below main deck level, but they never looked like starved dogs, maybe the thicker steel, ? passenger ships, ie cruise liners i presume are welded now, but there hulls look flush, ? regards, tony w.
-
12th February 2012, 11:28 PM
#4
No doubt someone will come up with some thermo dynamics and metallurgical physics to give you the scientific answer
Well Ivan
None of the above will be of any consequence after the detailed and concise report you have posted!
Very well put!
Thanks
Doc
Senior Site Moderator-Member and Friend of this Website
R697530
-
13th February 2012, 12:48 AM
#5
Maybe the passenger ships have additional and thicker coatings on the hulls to camouflage the results. At the prices they charge it wouldn't take too many passenger fares to pay for it!
-
13th February 2012, 09:07 AM
#6

Originally Posted by
Tony Morcom
Maybe the passenger ships have additional and thicker coatings on the hulls to camouflage the results. At the prices they charge it wouldn't take too many passenger fares to pay for it!
Passenger ships are built on completely different scantling requirements, tend to have a longer service life than freighters, so more investment is made in them and the material they are built from, don't think you can camouflage steel work with thicker coatings of paint. Even new warships look like starved dogs, warships and freighters although different have the same basic role, need to have a light displacement so that more goods (or armements) can be carried. Passenger ships are fairly constant in their deadweight, ferries normally have the starved dog look (nice descriptive expression that - starved dog) But as I said you will be receiving more scientific explanations along the line, you can bet your bottom dollar on it. I only speak from my own experiences and what I learnt from them along the way.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules