Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Dagmar I

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    5
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Dagmar I

    Hello Catleman,

    Some time ago you and some other kind people kindly responded to my request for information on the ships my father Wilfred Paul McCormick Christie (R153646) sailed on. The last one being the Dagmar 1 (167545) sailed 10 Sep 1940. The Dagmar I was an ex-danish "butter boat?". I have done further searches and found two books one is Beware Raiders which gives a report of the sinking. Apparently Commodore Dawson of Convoy HG53 sailed on Dagmar I and transfered his command when Dagmar I sank. The Captain A D Holburn made a report of the incident.
    My question is: Having seen the photo that you sent to me of Dagmar I which appears to be a coastal ship and not very large, I can also see a person standing on the open bridge in the photo. The ship in the photo, could it possibly be the same Dagmar I which was carrying boxes of oranges and oxide of iron in barrels from North Africa that was nearly sunk by a torpedo from U-37 and then sunk the next day 9 Feb 1941 by German Focke-Wulf Condor 200 off the coast Spain some 200 miles west of Cape Vincent.
    Not being a Merchant Seaman the ship in the photo seems rather small to be an ocean going vessel also is it likely that the Commodore would choose it as the Commodore's ship for Convoy HG53. Sorry to trouble you again. Thank you. Regards Fred Christie.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Stockton-on-Tees
    Posts
    1,715
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    2451
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2111

    Default

    Dagmar I had a gross registered tonnage of 2,471, which compared to the rest of the ships in convoy HG-53, was actually one of the biggest ships in the convoy.

    BRANDENBURG 1,473
    BRITANNIC II 2,490
    COURLAND 1,325
    COXWOLD 1,124
    DAGMAR I 2,471
    DAGO 1,757
    DISA 2,002
    EGYPTIAN PRINCE 3,490
    EMPIRE LOUGH 2,824
    EMPIRE TERN 2,479
    EMPIRE WARRIOR 1,306
    ESTRELLANO 1,982
    ICELAND 1,236
    JURA (Br) 1,759
    MARKLYN 3,090
    OUSEL 1,533
    SALLY MAERSK 3,252
    TEJO 967
    TOWARD 1,571
    VANELLUS 1,886
    VARNA 1,514
    WROTHAM 1,884
    "Across the seas where the great waves grow, there are no fields for the poppies to grow, but its a place where Seamen sleep, died for their country, for you and for peace" (Billy McGee 2011)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Torquay
    Posts
    11,467
    Thanks (Given)
    3440
    Thanks (Received)
    7761
    Likes (Given)
    11953
    Likes (Received)
    34930

    Default Dagmar I

    Quote Originally Posted by DeepSea View Post
    Dagmar I had a gross registered tonnage of 2,471, which compared to the rest of the ships in convoy HG-53, was actually one of the biggest ships in the convoy.

    BRANDENBURG 1,473
    BRITANNIC II 2,490
    COURLAND 1,325
    COXWOLD 1,124
    DAGMAR I 2,471
    DAGO 1,757
    DISA 2,002
    EGYPTIAN PRINCE 3,490
    EMPIRE LOUGH 2,824
    EMPIRE TERN 2,479
    EMPIRE WARRIOR 1,306
    ESTRELLANO 1,982
    ICELAND 1,236
    JURA (Br) 1,759
    MARKLYN 3,090
    OUSEL 1,533
    SALLY MAERSK 3,252
    TEJO 967
    TOWARD 1,571
    VANELLUS 1,886
    VARNA 1,514
    WROTHAM 1,884
    Billy you never fail to impress, we sure appreciate that you are on this site and also the help you give to others, I didn't think that just the thankyou button was adequate on this occasion and on other occasions also

    Ivan

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    5
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Dagmar I

    Hi DEEPSEA,

    Thanks for your response, however when you search for DAGMAR 1 the picture is of a smallish ship with an open bridge and a person can be seen on the bridge, surely thats not the same Dagmar I that was in the HG53?. Can you enlighten me.

    Regards Fred Christie

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Stockton-on-Tees
    Posts
    1,715
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    2451
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2111

    Default

    Dagmar I was built in 1903, so she probably had an open bridge. She was a relatively small ship, but don't underestimate the size of the ships being used in theses convoys. There were a lot smaller ships than her used in the same convoys and Dagmar I had been used in two previous HG convoys.

    Can you link me to the photo in question, as I do not know, which one you refer to.
    Last edited by DeepSea; 11th May 2011 at 06:43 PM.
    "Across the seas where the great waves grow, there are no fields for the poppies to grow, but its a place where Seamen sleep, died for their country, for you and for peace" (Billy McGee 2011)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Stockton-on-Tees
    Posts
    1,715
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    2451
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    2111

    Default

    To clear up ant doubt you may have, the National Maritime Museum has an original copy of a photo of this ship. Below is the address and negative number to quote when ordering.

    DAGMAR (Da) 50.1 1903 General cargo (ref. mchy) ex IMPERATOR NICOLAI II ex IRKUTSK Det Forenede Dampskibsselskab P9880 (6) B May 1937 Passing Tilbury. Slight image movement.

    Historic Photographs Section,
    National Maritime Museum,
    Greenwich,
    London,
    SE10 9NF
    Tel: +44 (0) 20 8312 8600
    Fax: +44 (0) 20 8317 0263
    E-mail: plansandphotos@nmm.ac.uk
    "Across the seas where the great waves grow, there are no fields for the poppies to grow, but its a place where Seamen sleep, died for their country, for you and for peace" (Billy McGee 2011)

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    5
    Thanks (Given)
    0
    Thanks (Received)
    0
    Likes (Given)
    0
    Likes (Received)
    0

    Default Dagmar's

    Hello DEEPSEA,

    Thanks for your response. The photo I originally had of Dagmar I was the one below Dagmar 01, Dagmar -02 is a sailing ship, then 03 and 04 are further Dagmar's. What I thought was Dagmar I is I think photo 1 or 4 photos of Dagmars. Hence my reason for trying to identify the correct ship.

    Thanks Fred Christie


    Old Ship Picture Thumbnails D (Dagmar-01)

    Old Ship Picture Thumbnails D (Dagmar-02) - sailing ship

    Old Ship Picture Thumbnails D (Dagmar-03)

    Old Ship Picture Thumbnails D (Dagmar-04)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •