Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 55

Thread: By royal appointment

  1. #41
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Cooma NSW
    Posts
    8,972
    Thanks (Given)
    10199
    Thanks (Received)
    5221
    Likes (Given)
    44159
    Likes (Received)
    26892

    Default Re: By royal appointment

    I think this is a big cover up, the Queen asked the two of them to go their ways; as she loves Harry and Meghan like no other. she told them that the Balcony at the Palace was getting too full. She has asked for some more building props to be put underneath in case of a collapse, while they peruse the options of using the roof to hold all the bludgers, that seem to be increasing every year.
    Des

  2. #42
    Keith at Tregenna's Avatar
    Keith at Tregenna Guest

    Default Re: By royal appointment

    I believe they have a one year escape clause,
    if things do not work out, they could be welcomed
    back to the firm.

    K.

  3. #43
    Keith at Tregenna's Avatar
    Keith at Tregenna Guest

    Default Re: By royal appointment

    The Queen's Megxit annual review: Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's commercial dealings will be assessed in one year to ensure they remain in line with the monarchy's values - as questions over Duchy money, protection and the use of their titles remain.

    Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are to be known as Harry, Duke of Sussex, and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex
    Last night's statement from the Queen said they will 'not use their HRH titles', suggesting it had been revoked
    But the Palace and Sussex households have now been accused of purposefully fudging the statement
    It transpired Harry and Meghan have not been stripped of the title, but have just agreed not to deploy it
    This sparked concern they could row back on their pledge if doing so could bolster their commercial brand

  4. #44
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Sunbury Victoria Australia
    Posts
    24,996
    Thanks (Given)
    8301
    Thanks (Received)
    10126
    Likes (Given)
    106550
    Likes (Received)
    45658

    Default Re: By royal appointment

    As one person said many years ago,
    'We live in interesting times"

    Time will tell as to how all of this proceeds, may work, may not.
    Happy daze John in Oz.

    Life is too short to blend in.

    John Strange R737787
    World Traveller

  5. #45
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    South Shields
    Posts
    5,203
    Thanks (Given)
    480
    Thanks (Received)
    6080
    Likes (Given)
    4096
    Likes (Received)
    14782

    Default Re: By royal appointment

    If they have scooted off to Vancouver island for a bit of privacy, they have got that bit wrong, already photos of Megan and baby have appeared on the internet and photographers are camped outside the property they are staying in.
    Rgds
    J.A.

  6. Likes happy daze john in oz liked this post
  7. #46
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Wirral
    Posts
    2,596
    Thanks (Given)
    2871
    Thanks (Received)
    2533
    Likes (Given)
    4410
    Likes (Received)
    6267

    Default Re: By royal appointment

    I see that they have threatened the Media, Canadian and otherwise with further legal action should they continue to photograph them. I can see trouble ahead and I sincerely hope it does not pull the Royal Family down.
    Last edited by Chris Allman; 22nd January 2020 at 04:02 PM.
    When one door closes another one shuts, it must be the wind

  8. #47
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Sunbury Victoria Australia
    Posts
    24,996
    Thanks (Given)
    8301
    Thanks (Received)
    10126
    Likes (Given)
    106550
    Likes (Received)
    45658

    Default Re: By royal appointment

    If they thought that by going to Canada they would escape the media then all I can say is that they are very naïve.
    The media live under rocks and crawl out like the scum they are.
    Happy daze John in Oz.

    Life is too short to blend in.

    John Strange R737787
    World Traveller

  9. Likes Captain Kong liked this post
  10. #48
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Torquay
    Posts
    11,467
    Thanks (Given)
    3440
    Thanks (Received)
    7758
    Likes (Given)
    11953
    Likes (Received)
    34924

    Default Re: By royal appointment

    I was a reluctant viewer (Wendy wanted to watch it) of the interview with Thomas Markle, he didn't strike me as being a bum, but a very doting father from the photos and videos in his possession, and she a doting daughter. It looks like in the engagement of his daughter he had become overwhelmed and led astray by the Press attention he received and also misquoted by them, and those of us who have had dealings with the Press know how that feels. Who knows how any of us would have reacted suddenly faced with one of our offspring becoming engaged to an immediate royal. Perhaps in their present situation H & M will come to realise that perhaps Thomas Markle isn't the ogre they are portraying him as, but is as much a victim of publicity as they seem to think they are.

  11. #49
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Sunbury Victoria Australia
    Posts
    24,996
    Thanks (Given)
    8301
    Thanks (Received)
    10126
    Likes (Given)
    106550
    Likes (Received)
    45658

    Default Re: By royal appointment

    Quote Originally Posted by Victoria Moss View Post
    Don't forget John lots of people thrive on reading what they write about all this. Nothing like "sticky beaking" into other peoples lives to liven up their own
    Victoria, never a truer word spoken.
    Those that feed on such rubbish are no better than those who publish.
    But they will not find it easy in Canada, far from it.
    Could be that at the end of the trial period they want to go back home.
    Happy daze John in Oz.

    Life is too short to blend in.

    John Strange R737787
    World Traveller

  12. Likes N/A liked this post
Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •