John, your #45 refers.
Few would deny your tremendous contribution to this site, much of which I generally find of interest.
However, having read various comments made by you in recent months (concerning Syria, the Middle-East and elsewhere) it wasn't hard for me to discern a certain bias. It was this seeming lack of balance with which I took issue. Instead of addressing the points I raised, by way of robust debate, you choose to evade the issue and respond with a flippant disdain which does you little credit. No doubt encouraged by your lead and reverting to type, your friend, Cappy, couldn't wait to have a 'pop' at me and with his usual literary 'flare' made a few incendiary remarks and immediately labelled me a troublemaker (I'll not dignify his 'post' with a direct response, however if my 'biting' remarks are deemed out of order I feel sure the Moderator will advise me in due course). While we are on the subject, John, tell me this, are you two joined at the hip? I cannot speak for others but for me your tag-team routine sometimes wears a bit thin.
For many months now, your regularly voiced opinions have enjoyed free rein on this site. It seems other members are in full accord with your every word unless, of course, wiser heads than I have shown a reluctance to 'rock the boat' - and if so more's the pity. On the other hand, I raise a conflicting opinion to your own, voice it in no uncertain terms and wow!all hell breaks loose. True democracy at work ! - Ignore the debate, John, and thereby silence all dissension - way to go !!!
It never once occurred to me you were/are a protected species - I now stand corrected!
......Roger