Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Is this the new system for MN

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Australia NSW Newcastle
    Posts
    1,550
    Thanks (Given)
    169
    Thanks (Received)
    713
    Likes (Given)
    429
    Likes (Received)
    2801

    Default Is this the new system for MN

    Crew Member Dies During Mooring Operation — A Tragic Reminder of the Importance of Safe Practices and Proper Training
    By: Seafarer Social

    A crew member tragically lost his life during a mooring operation while attempting to heave in a tug’s towline using a messenger line and the ship’s warping drum. The incident occurred on the aft mooring deck of a cargo vessel during what should have been a standard towing arrangement. Instead, the combination of poor seamanship, improper equipment use, and lack of procedural adherence led to a fatal outcome.

    The operation began with the tug passing its steel tow wire—44mm in diameter and weighing approximately 7.8 kg per meter—via a messenger line connected to the vessel’s own line. The crew attempted to heave in the tow wire using a warping drum, taking eight to ten turns of the messenger line, far more than the standard three to four turns typically recommended to gain traction safely. As the drum rotated, the turns accumulated on the outboard end due to a poor lead angle, and the line eventually formed riding turns.

    As the operation continued, the tail end of the messenger line was pulled back into the drum area, where it formed a loose loop around the crew member’s neck. Within moments, the crew member collapsed and was later declared dead at the port due to a fracture dislocation of the cervical spine.

    Key Findings from the Incident Report:

    -The messenger line was led through the pedestal fairlead from the wrong direction, causing damage to hydraulic pipes and contributing to the unsafe angle of the operation.

    -The crew failed to follow basic line-handling procedures. Up to ten turns were taken on the warping drum, and the tail end of the line was not properly backed up or controlled.

    -No stopper was applied to hold the tow wire once the towing eye reached the bitts, creating further hazards during the transition.

    -The aft mooring team demonstrated a lack of fundamental seamanship and failed to recognize the risks involved in their approach.

    -The layout of the aft mooring deck offered no obvious safe method to retrieve a tow wire through the center lead, reflecting poor equipment and deck design.

    -The tug’s mate had attempted to alert the crew to the risks and urged them to use the winch properly, but these warnings were not followed.

    This incident serves as a stark reminder that mooring operations, though routine, carry significant risk when handled improperly. The design of mooring stations, the condition and configuration of equipment, and—most importantly—the competency of the personnel involved must all be aligned to ensure safety.

    Proper training in line handling, familiarity with the equipment’s intended use, and adherence to safe mooring practices are not optional—they are essential. Shipowners, managers, and training providers must continue to emphasize safety not just through policies but through regular drills, mentorship, and a commitment to seamanship at all levels.

    Seafarer Social shares this case not to assign blame, but to encourage learning, awareness, and proactive safety culture across the industry. Every loss is one too many. Let us not wait for another incident before taking action.

    #SeafarerSocial #MaritimeSafety #CrewWelfare #MooringOperations #LineHandling #SafetyFirst #LearningFromIncidents

    Can never recall hearing of this at all during my time at sea. One big question that was not raised? Was winch manned at the controls and if so why the feck did he not turn it of. Not to mention ten turns on the drum end. Would have had my backside kicked from the stern stations to the bow stations if I had tried that. This is the result of them cutting corners and employing people without a brain.
    That's the way the mop flops.

    My thanks to Brian for this site.

  2. Thanks Doc Vernon thanked for this post
    Likes John Arton liked this post
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Australia NSW Newcastle
    Posts
    1,550
    Thanks (Given)
    169
    Thanks (Received)
    713
    Likes (Given)
    429
    Likes (Received)
    2801

    Default Re: Is this the new system for MN

    Bloody hell when is it going to end and they wake up to the fact that they have fecked up big time. Seems lack of maintenance might be the cause of running into bridges hey

    Two people have been killed and at least 19 others injured after a tall Mexican Navy training sailing ship crashed into New York City's Brooklyn Bridge.

    Police said the Cuauhtémoc, with 277 people on board, lost power on Saturday as the captain was manoeuvring the vessel, forcing it to head for the bridge abutment on the Brooklyn side.

    Footage shows the ship's towering masts clip the bridge as it passed under the structure. Crew members were standing on the masts as they snapped and fell to the deck, authorities said.

    Brooklyn resident Nick Corso, who witnessed the accident, said the area erupted in panic. There was "lots of screaming, some sailors hanging from the masts," he told AFP.
    That's the way the mop flops.

    My thanks to Brian for this site.

  4. Thanks Doc Vernon thanked for this post
    Likes Tony Taylor liked this post
  5. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Blue Mountains NSW
    Posts
    25,167
    Thanks (Given)
    47061
    Thanks (Received)
    13559
    Likes (Given)
    54915
    Likes (Received)
    41127
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default Re: Is this the new system for MN

    2 killed after Mexican Navy tall ship smashes into Brooklyn Bridge

    Surely the Captain could have known that the Ships Masts were far too high!
    Oh what a shambles!
    Thank Les!
    Cheers

    Sailors dangle high above water after Mexican Navy ship hits Brooklyn Bridge | Watch
    Senior Site Moderator-Member and Friend of this Website

    R697530

  6. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    W.A.
    Posts
    25,505
    Thanks (Given)
    13719
    Thanks (Received)
    14639
    Likes (Given)
    20234
    Likes (Received)
    81855

    Default Re: Is this the new system for MN

    I would imagine this would be a compulsory pilotage area and the master would have to declare his air draft. Someone has got their sums wrong. JS
    R575129

  7. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Location
    Prenton
    Posts
    3,865
    Thanks (Given)
    471
    Thanks (Received)
    1872
    Likes (Given)
    3155
    Likes (Received)
    5554
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: Is this the new system for MN

    Why no escort tug yet again , did they learn nothing from Baltimore. Trump will blame the Mexicans saying it was an attack on our nation. Seriously are they really that thick over there.

  8. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Torquay
    Posts
    11,763
    Thanks (Given)
    3480
    Thanks (Received)
    8047
    Likes (Given)
    12083
    Likes (Received)
    36018

    Default Re: Is this the new system for MN

    [QUOTE=Doc Vernon;441467][URL="https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/05/17/mexican-navy-sailing-ship-hits-brooklyn-bridge/83704506007
    Surely the Captain could have known that the Ships Masts were far too high!
    Oh what a shambles!
    Thank Les!
    Cheers
    [/QUOTE]

    The vessel lost power whilst heading for the centre channel which had the largest air draft and the vessel would have passed safely underneath. with no power the tide forced her towards shore side where the airdraft under the bridge was lower thus fouling her masts. When the vessel lost power the Master or Mate should have cleared the masts and yards of all personnel. There would have been a pilot on board, but as yet we do not know the full circumstances of avoiding action taken (if any) such as dropping both anchors, but in some if not nearly all ports now, that is forbidden because of all the underwater pipelines and service lines criss crossing the river beds, so there were probably few actions the Master or Pilot could have taken to alleviate the situation.

  9. Thanks j.sabourn thanked for this post
    Likes Tony Taylor, j.sabourn liked this post

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •