Re: Submarines
We all know that the submarine contract is political and has been from the start. Firstly it was to prop up C Pyne for the coming election at the time. What I can not understand is that Turnball refused the nuclear subs from the french and wanted them converted to diesel at great expense. Futhermore it seems that the nuclear power of the frensh subs are a much lower grade than the UK and USA who use weapon grade uranium Now there is a movement to lease or purchase second hand sub from UK or USA who in my opinion would love to do that. They would be getting rid of their old subs that when time to decommission them is a headache that no country wants to face especially with weapon grade uranium in them. So summing up it seems that the safest and cheapest way might be to stick with the frogs. Personally think that by the time these are built that submarines will be redundant anyway Not to mention that the crews for them are not yet born. Who can recall our great leader of the day purchasing those tanks from the USA and the amount spent to refit them out and what bloddy use are they in a country this size.
That's the way the mop flops.
My thanks to Brian for this site.