Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 36

Thread: Draw your own conclusions !!!!

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    plymouth devon ex enfield
    Posts
    1,895
    Thanks (Given)
    337
    Thanks (Received)
    71
    Likes (Given)
    1722
    Likes (Received)
    358

    Default Re: Draw your own conclusions !!!!

    how can the government justify all those admirals and captains for 19 ships. sack the lot of them!. cameron must be proud of the fact that he invented or caused to be invented; food banks. even in the second world war we didn't have them and we were on rations. he sends billions to other countries and over here the mentally ill and others are sent out onto the streets to survive and also kill people. our MP's are useless. it need the man in the street to stand up in the house of commons and tell the people what is happening.
    Backsheesh runs the World
    people talking about you is none of your business
    R397928

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    W.A.
    Posts
    23,787
    Thanks (Given)
    12920
    Thanks (Received)
    13776
    Likes (Given)
    19188
    Likes (Received)
    77165

    Default Re: Draw your own conclusions !!!!

    Years ago they used to go on half pay, anyone know when that was stopped. It would probably cost more to pension them off than to keep employed pushing papers around and other probable clerical work. I believe the Americans keep so much merchant tonnage in mothballs for emergencies such as troop carriers etc. its a pity the British government didn't budget to do something similar, they have the manpower but no vessels as such. It must be soul destroying to be a regular commissioned officer in the RN and have to fight for seatime. However every British Merchant seaman has been through the same process. So knows what it is like. Britannia no longer Rules the Waves. John Sabourn

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Inverness, Scotland
    Posts
    1,683
    Thanks (Given)
    272
    Thanks (Received)
    1892
    Likes (Given)
    1154
    Likes (Received)
    2840

    Default Re: Draw your own conclusions !!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by j.sabourn View Post
    If my memory is correct I believe the conversion on the vessel I was there for the Trials before handing over to the Navy was renamed HMS Guardian or Sentinel or something similar. Cheers John Sabourn
    I think it was 'SEAFORTH CHAMPION' that becaume HMS GUARDIAN and 'SEAFORTH WARRIOR' that becaume HMS SENTINEL. 'SEAFORTH SAGA' became HMS PROTECTOR.
    'SEAFORTH CLANSMAN' as far as I know, did not go to the RN and was later renamed 'GRAY SEAL'.
    Regards
    Hugh
    "If Blood was the price
    We had to pay for our freedom
    Then the Merchant Ship Sailors
    Paid it in full”


    www.sscityofcairo.co.uk

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Long Eaton
    Posts
    5,438
    Thanks (Given)
    793
    Thanks (Received)
    5729
    Likes (Given)
    15542
    Likes (Received)
    17532

    Default Re: Draw your own conclusions !!!!

    There care 126 ships in the Royal Navy. Of these 19 are major surface ships (destroyers and frigates), unfortunately this is the number that the press quote as being the size of the RN. It doesn't justify the number of gold braid that they have.

    As an anecdote we were in Durban in the 70's and the old Ark Royal was on its paying off visit, old Nookie Nichols our chief looked across and said paint her funnel black with two red bands and we could run her with 7 engineers and two leckies.

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Inverness, Scotland
    Posts
    1,683
    Thanks (Given)
    272
    Thanks (Received)
    1892
    Likes (Given)
    1154
    Likes (Received)
    2840

    Default Re: Draw your own conclusions !!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by vic mcclymont View Post
    As an anecdote we were in Durban in the 70's and the old Ark Royal was on its paying off visit, old Nookie Nichols our chief looked across and said paint her funnel black with two red bands and we could run her with 7 engineers and two leckies.
    With respect Vic, Mr Nichols and his 7 engineers and two leckies could run her I am sure of that, but not as a warship you wouldn't - Sorry.

    Regards
    Hugh
    Last edited by Hugh; 20th October 2013 at 05:20 PM.
    "If Blood was the price
    We had to pay for our freedom
    Then the Merchant Ship Sailors
    Paid it in full”


    www.sscityofcairo.co.uk

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Waterlooville Hampshire UK
    Posts
    7,068
    Thanks (Given)
    1693
    Thanks (Received)
    3690
    Likes (Given)
    3684
    Likes (Received)
    13350

    Default Re: Draw your own conclusions !!!!

    Seaforth Clansman is now St Barbara was

    ZEALOUS
    GRAY SEAL
    SEAFORTH CLANSMAN

    At present moored in Gdansk

    Latest information http://www.marinetraffic.com/ais/shi...mmsi=375666000
    Last edited by robpage; 20th October 2013 at 07:21 PM.
    Rob Page R855150 - British & Commonwealth Shipping ( 1965 - 1973 ) Gulf Oil -( 1973 - 1975 ) Sealink ( 1975 - 1986 )

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Long Eaton
    Posts
    5,438
    Thanks (Given)
    793
    Thanks (Received)
    5729
    Likes (Given)
    15542
    Likes (Received)
    17532

    Default Re: Draw your own conclusions !!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh View Post
    With respect Vic, Mr Nichols and his 7 engineers and two leckies could run her I am sure of that, but not as a warship you wouldn't - Sorry.

    Regards
    Hugh
    HI Hugh, intention was not to run it as warship, reference to black funnel and two red bands was Clan Lines and run it under that company banner.
    Vic

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Inverness, Scotland
    Posts
    1,683
    Thanks (Given)
    272
    Thanks (Received)
    1892
    Likes (Given)
    1154
    Likes (Received)
    2840

    Default Re: Draw your own conclusions !!!!

    Apologies Vic, I took a different meaning from your post. It is a fact that many MN people have said to me and still do say that they don't understand why a warship has such a large crew compared to say a vessel of similar size in the MN. The reasons to me are obvious but I get tired at times trying to explain it. My first ship was an aircraft carrier it had over 2,200 men onboard. As a minority ex-RN guy on here, I am perhaps a little over sensitive when it comes to speaking up on behalf of my old service.
    Regards
    Hugh
    "If Blood was the price
    We had to pay for our freedom
    Then the Merchant Ship Sailors
    Paid it in full”


    www.sscityofcairo.co.uk

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Torquay
    Posts
    11,467
    Thanks (Given)
    3440
    Thanks (Received)
    7761
    Likes (Given)
    11953
    Likes (Received)
    34930

    Default Re: Draw your own conclusions !!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Hugh View Post
    My first ship was an aircraft carrier it had over 2,200 men onboard. As a minority ex-RN guy on here, I am perhaps a little over sensitive when it comes to speaking up on behalf of my old service.
    Regards
    Hugh
    Continue being sensitive Hugh and defend as is your right, afraid to say most of us Merchant men have no real understanding of all the specialist trades on RN ships as we have to muddle through as a jack of all trades on a commercial basis. Got my understanding of RN manning requirements during the Suez invasion when invited aboard various ships, some probably still overmanned at that time, but that was the National Service era, if I remember rightly. As far as I remember it took 5/6 men to attend and service one gun, now one man can operate 5/6 guns and now ships carry more 'techies' than outright seamen. We all have a role to play in life.

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    W.A.
    Posts
    23,787
    Thanks (Given)
    12920
    Thanks (Received)
    13776
    Likes (Given)
    19188
    Likes (Received)
    77165

    Default Re: Draw your own conclusions !!!!

    Ivan , once again people fall back on the old fallacy of demanning as required on merchant ships now assuming that is all these ships require. Once again I come up with the remark that it is bulls##t, most of the tonnage is still of the old variety, and even if it wasn't they are still pushing safety to the extremes. During my time working with naval personnel in a purely civilian capacity, I found that they were all fully employed at all times no matter what position they held, maybe the naval officers appeared to me to have an easier time than most but they must have had jobs I was unaware of. The average merchant seaman groping around in the red lighting system of a ship at stations would have thought he was in a brothel those were my first thoughts on the first night on trials. The bofors guns require 3 of a crew on each, and as said one was manned by the cooks and the other by the marines. The electronic gadgetry most of it probably still under the Official Secrets Act would take a number of specialists to maintain. Boarding parties are often required and this is all manpower taken from different departments. I remember HMS Reclaim asking the mn Crew on the Seaforth Clansman to put a boarding party on a suspected Russian trawler as he was short of manpower. I sent 2 ABs over in a Zodiac, it turned out to be a Hull Trawler and the skipper chased them. However it could of been otherwise. The navy have a lot of irregular ships also and I as an independent observer would say they would lose our so called H & S regulators. I just thank God we do have a few warships left. Regards John Sabourn
    Last edited by j.sabourn; 21st October 2013 at 12:09 AM.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •