Re: Rolf
I am new to this thread, so had to go through the posts to find out what y'all were talking about. About the midpoint it broke away to "scumbag lawyers" and some of the villains they represented.
Here's the problem and my opinion, when something like that is said over a heinous crime being committed, and someone "charged" not pre-convicted, "...and should be lynched", goes' against our rules of Justice. Innocent until proven guilty. Alleged, presumed, supposed, inferred, hypothesized, are used for a person, regardless of the circumstances, until he/she pleads guilty or is convicted. That is our judicial system. Our system gives a person the right to represent themself or to have legal counsel. Therefore, the law says there must be us or legal representation, or a "scumbag". Therefore, there must be defense lawyers.
If the worst person in modern times, Adolph Hitler had been captured alive (very unlikely I know) he would have been tried and witnesses would have to have spoken against him, and Hitler would have had to have a lawyer/attorney. No attorney would do that voluntarily, however military lawyers would have been ordered to defend him, how would you or I like to have to live with that if we were military attorneys and defended Hitler and it would have to be a spirited defense to the best of our abilities?
If you or I were rightfully or in error charged with a crime we would clamor for legal representation, if no money, the court would provide one. Somebody has to do the dirty legal work. I would hate to have to say, "He's a scumbag, but he's my scumbag.
Cheers, Rodney
Rodney David Richard Mills
R602188 Gravesend