Page 8 of 13 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 ... LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 124

Thread: N. Sea Collision

  1. #71
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    South Shields
    Posts
    5,455
    Thanks (Given)
    481
    Thanks (Received)
    6390
    Likes (Given)
    4503
    Likes (Received)
    15490

    Default Re: N. Sea Collision

    The last time I went through the Suez canal we had just learnt that we were all being made redundant once we arrived in Rotterdam and discharged the cargo of veg oils.The captain got all electrical items that were not bolted down, placed them in the ships office and invited the bum boat guys to make him an offer, much squabbling amongst them then a price arrived at , the chief engineer flogged off all the scrap brass along with a load of stainless steel piping.
    Later, anchored in the bitter lakes awaiting the south bound convoy to clear, the pilot came on board and demanded a bottle of whiskey and 400 marlboro. The captain refused so the pilot said, no presents, no move. The captain said o.k and went down to his cabin telling me to call him when the pilot was ready to move. I was mate and sat on the bridge with the pilot storming around and demanding his presents. Once the last south bound vessel had cleared and the north bound vessels started to move, tankers being the lead ships, the captain came on the bridge and asked the pilot if he was ready to move but of course he definitely repeated, no presents, no move.
    The captain got on the VHF to the canals control station and told them we weren't moving as the pilot was demanding alcohol and cigarettes before he would carry out his duties.
    Now I don't speak Arabic but whatever the shore control screamed at him, all of a sudden a very subdued pilot said captain, up anchor quickly, we go or loose our position. Transit taken with a very sullen pilot speaking only to give helm and engine moves.
    Rgds
    J.A
    Last edited by John Arton; 20th March 2025 at 11:25 AM.

  2. #72
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Location
    Prenton
    Posts
    3,816
    Thanks (Given)
    466
    Thanks (Received)
    1850
    Likes (Given)
    3124
    Likes (Received)
    5464
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: N. Sea Collision

    Remember once on a BP LNG carrier the pilot boat came a longside the lowered gangway that had that had the pilot ladder down the side.
    The pilot looked at it and demanded the gangway be lowered as he not climb the few steps up the ladder so he could gain access to the gangway. Reason the gangway was not lowered was to prevent possible damage to the gangway by the pilot boat. Eventually he had to climb about 6 rungs to get on the Gangway. Even by doing that he demanded we raise the gangway to deck level. I heard the 3rd mate say to the ETO go and make sure the accomdation lift is out of action. ETO pulled the breaker aand parked the lift at the engineroom control room level. By the time the pilot made it to the bridge via the stairs he was turning purple, served the fat arrogant bastrad right.

  3. #73
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    South Shields
    Posts
    5,455
    Thanks (Given)
    481
    Thanks (Received)
    6390
    Likes (Given)
    4503
    Likes (Received)
    15490

    Default Re: N. Sea Collision

    https://maritime-executive.com/artic...vage-continues
    The crews from both vessels have been repatriated as salvage of both vessels continues. Meanwhile the Solong captain remains in custody charged with gross negligence and manslaughter.
    Rgds
    J.A

  4. Thanks Des Jenkins thanked for this post
    Likes Tony Taylor liked this post
  5. #74
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    CHESTER LE STREET
    Posts
    2,718
    Thanks (Given)
    755
    Thanks (Received)
    1474
    Likes (Given)
    14366
    Likes (Received)
    9188

    Default Re: N. Sea Collision

    Reports this morning say that the Solong will be towed to Aberdeen for salvage

  6. Thanks happy daze john in oz, Des Jenkins thanked for this post
  7. #75
    Join Date
    Mar 2022
    Location
    Prenton
    Posts
    3,816
    Thanks (Given)
    466
    Thanks (Received)
    1850
    Likes (Given)
    3124
    Likes (Received)
    5464
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Re: N. Sea Collision

    At whose insistance is the Captain still being held in custody? He may a Russian but does he live in Russia? The fact that the Stena Immaculate was carrying a cargo intended for the US air force ? No doubt pressure has been brought to bare from the Donald & his Chief of defence guy. I suppose one could check on What's App the information might be there
    The Captain is obviously considered to be a flight risk, not knowing anything about maritime law is it a normal practice to detain the master when a vessel is involved in a collision when there is a loss of Life.
    Surely there would be an entry in the ships log as to who was in the wheel house at the time of the collision. Also would the book containing the masters Standing orders not have been recovered?

  8. Thanks happy daze john in oz thanked for this post
  9. #76
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    5,749
    Thanks (Given)
    485
    Thanks (Received)
    3572
    Likes (Given)
    2436
    Likes (Received)
    15362

    Default Re: N. Sea Collision

    was the tanker at anchor and swinging around that would give a false site for a lookout port and starbourt light in different potitions?just a thought jp

  10. Likes happy daze john in oz liked this post
  11. #77
    Join Date
    Apr 2022
    Location
    Basildon
    Posts
    989
    Thanks (Given)
    87
    Thanks (Received)
    544
    Likes (Given)
    988
    Likes (Received)
    3378

    Default Re: N. Sea Collision

    If I remember right, there would be no navigation lights on, just the at anchor lights.

  12. #78
    Join Date
    May 2023
    Location
    hertfordshire
    Posts
    128
    Thanks (Given)
    104
    Thanks (Received)
    83
    Likes (Given)
    415
    Likes (Received)
    272

    Default Re: N. Sea Collision

    #35 No i do not remember the British Trent collision

  13. Likes Des Jenkins liked this post
  14. #79
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Torquay
    Posts
    11,739
    Thanks (Given)
    3477
    Thanks (Received)
    8027
    Likes (Given)
    12070
    Likes (Received)
    35926

    Default Re: N. Sea Collision

    Quote Originally Posted by James Curry View Post
    At whose insistance is the Captain still being held in custody?

    The Captain is obviously considered to be a flight risk, not knowing anything about maritime law is it a normal practice to detain the master when a vessel is involved in a collision when there is a loss of Life.

    Surely there would be an entry in the ships log as to who was in the wheel house at the time of the collision. Also would the book containing the masters Standing orders not have been recovered?
    Arresting a Master and detaining in custody whether a major or minor incident is involved, seems to be the modern trend, as someone has to be seen to be doing something regardless of the facts. Alas when a Master of a vessel that old notice on the desk becomes reality 'The Buck Stops Here'

    It was (don't know about modern times) not normal to put the name of the quartermaster at the wheel into the log book, if it was it would be the same guy for 24 hours for a 10/20 day crossing 'Iron Mike'

    For some inexplicable reason the quartermaster of the Costa Concordia received an 18 month prison sentence, poor sod had no authority in the decision making to the course of the vessel, unless of course he fled the bridge as land loomed large in the Bridge window

  15. Thanks Des Jenkins thanked for this post
    Likes happy daze john in oz liked this post
  16. #80
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    W.A.
    Posts
    25,421
    Thanks (Given)
    13682
    Thanks (Received)
    14592
    Likes (Given)
    20170
    Likes (Received)
    81613

    Default Re: N. Sea Collision

    #77 good answer Johnny, but known theory and fact do not always match up . Some over zealous third mate might of put the navigation lights on before the anchor was off the bottom. Something else to throw into the heap of woe. The master has always been held responsible for any damage to his own and any other vessel , even to oil spillages he may have no physical control over, until of course they get round to the Cheng. If your the driver of a car you are held responsible for any crash until the facts are assimilated . Then we come around to the old breathalyser tests and any alcohol if present is going to be held responsible for a lot if any traces found. The Inquiry whilst not always 100% correct is the final,judgement like it or not. I never knew the helmsman on the Concordia went to gaol Ivan , there must have been some reason for that surely , if he was obeying the helm orders he was innocent , did he maybe have alcohol or drugs in his system ? That’s a new one on me. JS
    R575129

Page 8 of 13 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8 9 10 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •