John, my decade working with AID in various countries left me with sadness at the way corruption influenced many factors of said AID operations and I suppose many organisations large and small succumbed to becoming involved in one way or another unintentionally because of weariness, jaundiced views of those in power in various countries who took advantage of the largesse of donor countries, and of course the endless internal conflicts of indigenous peoples who didn't seem to mind that their fellow citizens of another tribe or sect succumbing to malnutrition.
You learnt that mother nature was not the cause of these so called natural disasters or even more popular today the excuse of 'climate change' the major contributory factor was man's inhumanity to man, together with the goal of certain individuals whether they be political or military, of being in power at whatever cost.
Alas the recipient countries are not alone in corruption, but administration bodies of donor countries centralised in one city in Europe (not Brussels I may add, nearer the Pope!) are also guilty of what may be called passive corruption with jobs for the boys, with extremely high salaries, luxury accommodation, perks, travel and inflation proof lifetime pensions even with short term in office, most of whom don't even know where the country is that they are supposed to be saving. Whilst the boots on the ground are supposed to make do and mend in difficult conditions whilst lacking the equipment and resources to carry out their tasks whilst enduring the unpredictability of local warlords or governing bodies.
The methods of corruption, both physical and psychological, are too many to go into, but even things like rebagging grain which arrived in bags free of charge from donor countries to 'X' Govt would then be rebagged by 'X' into bags bearing the words 'a gift from the Government of 'X' to its people'
As for alcohol and the 'true believers' well we all know about hypocrosy!