Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: water tight doors

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    286
    Thanks (Given)
    24
    Thanks (Received)
    119
    Likes (Given)
    32
    Likes (Received)
    396

    Default Re: water tight doors

    P&O (1953) Arcadia had watertight doors on all decks below waterline, they could be remotely closed (sideways) or wound shut with a handle which was always kept next to the doors, whenever we had fire or boat drills these doors were always closed, I beleive that there was always an exit upwards from each compartment.
    keith moody
    R635978

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    South Shields
    Posts
    5,494
    Thanks (Given)
    481
    Thanks (Received)
    6445
    Likes (Given)
    4565
    Likes (Received)
    15626

    Default Re: water tight doors

    Rob
    Re. the water tight doors on the Titanic.
    Am I right in thinking that when they eventually found the wreck and were able to get the r.o.v. into the interior, its video showed that the watertight doors were closed? In that case the escape route up by the funnels should have been available, is that not correct? Another theory I seem to recall as to why so few engineers survived was that when the boiler rooms suffered such a huge ingress of water there was an explosion caused by water hitting the boilers or that a coal dust explosion occurred.
    If my memory is correct these theories were proven when they found that on sinking the Titanic did not go down bow first but rather slid below the surface and then broke in half under water in the region of the boiler room.
    rgds
    JA
    rgds
    JA

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    plymouth devon ex enfield
    Posts
    1,895
    Thanks (Given)
    337
    Thanks (Received)
    71
    Likes (Given)
    1722
    Likes (Received)
    358

    Default Re: water tight doors

    i was on the Llandovery Castle (built 1925?) and thedoorway between the pantry and the saloon was a side opening water tight door with a large open ended spanner to operate it in emergency. on rough days you had to judge very carefully and wait for the ship to end her roll then quickly get through with your arms full of plates.it was reported many times but nothing was done and the passengers on my tables complained about the noise when it slammed shut or opened.
    Backsheesh runs the World
    people talking about you is none of your business
    R397928

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Waterlooville Hampshire UK
    Posts
    6,936
    Thanks (Given)
    1693
    Thanks (Received)
    3691
    Likes (Given)
    3684
    Likes (Received)
    13356

    Default Re: water tight doors

    The legend was that these men stood bravely by their posts , to maintain steam for the generators keeping the electrics and the bilge pumps running . from my recollections of the steam ships I as on forty years more modern than the Titanic the funnel escape was a difficult route on a good day . I am assuming that in those days a sense of duty prevailed . I suspect that in this day and age , there may be a reluctance to stand by your post as the ship sinks about you . I am though convinced that there was not a local control fitted .
    Rob Page R855150 - British & Commonwealth Shipping ( 1965 - 1973 ) Gulf Oil -( 1973 - 1975 ) Sealink ( 1975 - 1986 )

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    W.A.
    Posts
    25,608
    Thanks (Given)
    13783
    Thanks (Received)
    14696
    Likes (Given)
    20310
    Likes (Received)
    82211

    Default Re: water tight doors

    Inclined to agree with you Rob. They stayed at their posts more than likely they were unaware of the situation until it was too late, and had no known means of escape. It is only on the knowledge that nothing can be done that one accepts the inevitable. Any human being with the strength to do so would have taken a course of action to prevent death. JS

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Waterlooville Hampshire UK
    Posts
    6,936
    Thanks (Given)
    1693
    Thanks (Received)
    3691
    Likes (Given)
    3684
    Likes (Received)
    13356

    Default Re: water tight doors

    I understand the doors as full height , but the watertight compartments did not go all the way to the weather deck . and one tipped into the next .
    Rob Page R855150 - British & Commonwealth Shipping ( 1965 - 1973 ) Gulf Oil -( 1973 - 1975 ) Sealink ( 1975 - 1986 )

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Torquay
    Posts
    11,798
    Thanks (Given)
    3486
    Thanks (Received)
    8068
    Likes (Given)
    12112
    Likes (Received)
    36166

    Default Re: water tight doors

    From the plans I've seen the w/t doors were the full height of the bulkheads, but the bulkheads were not high enough to prevent water passing from one compartment to another, so the result was inevitable, but as Richard says it was early days and no one, but no one ever expected such an unsinkable vessel to be faced with such a situation. Unfortunately safety only becomes safety after an accident proves the safety feature incorrect, and thus it has ever been, we learn by our mistakes, but they did try to foresee every conceivable eventuality at that time, but alas human error played a major part, as well as the new steering gear system where-in when the wheel was put to starboard the vessel went to starboard, where as the majority of the ships at that time putting the wheel to starboard the vessel went to port, as in the tiller system, and you can bet your bottom dollar that all the senior bridge staff had recently sailed with the tiller system and the sight of thousands of tons of ice approaching at speed meant familiarality probably took over in those moments and added to the cause that may have been avoided, we will never know!

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Waterlooville Hampshire UK
    Posts
    6,936
    Thanks (Given)
    1693
    Thanks (Received)
    3691
    Likes (Given)
    3684
    Likes (Received)
    13356

    Default Re: water tight doors

    I always took blame to be a modern invention , but I have seen everyone from the look out to the designer blamed for the loss of the Titanic , I worked for a whilst in British rail , they had a culture of lets not worry about blame ., lets get to the truth , than meant let's truly find out who is to blame
    Rob Page R855150 - British & Commonwealth Shipping ( 1965 - 1973 ) Gulf Oil -( 1973 - 1975 ) Sealink ( 1975 - 1986 )

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Sunbury Victoria Australia
    Posts
    26,315
    Thanks (Given)
    9565
    Thanks (Received)
    10617
    Likes (Given)
    112561
    Likes (Received)
    47994

    Default Re: water tight doors

    Went to the Titanic exhibition here in Oz some years back. It would appear that from the drawings and reports from survivors it was the case thta the doors were not high enough. Not going up to higher decks allowed water to flow from one section to the next. But it is believed one boiler did explode whan the ice cold water flowed in when the burg struck.
    Happy daze John in Oz.

    Life is too short to blend in.

    John Strange R737787
    World Traveller

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2

Similar Threads

  1. Oil & Water
    By vic mcclymont in forum Merchant Navy General Postings
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 28th December 2013, 01:16 PM
  2. Water
    By gray_marian in forum Trivia and Interesting Stuff
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 12th December 2013, 10:58 AM
  3. for the want of water we drank water
    By albertliss1935 in forum Merchant Navy General Postings
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 22nd December 2010, 11:07 PM
  4. Tight
    By E.Martin in forum Shell Tankers
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 26th September 2009, 07:44 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •