By registering with our site you will have full instant access to:
268,000 posts on every subject imaginable contributed by 1000's of members worldwide.
25000 photos and videos mainly relating to the British Merchant Navy.
Members experienced in research to help you find out about friends and relatives who served.
The camaraderie of 1000's of ex Merchant Seamen who use the site for recreation & nostalgia.
Here we are all equal whether ex Deck Boy or Commodore of the Fleet.
A wealth of experience and expertise from all departments spanning 70+ years.
It is simple to register and membership is absolutely free.
N.B. If you are going to be requesting help from one of the forums with finding historical details of a relative
please include as much information as possible to help members assist you. We certainly need full names,
date and place of birth / death where possible plus any other details you have such as discharge book numbers etc.
Please post all questions onto the appropriate forum
As I feel there are quite a few on here that have NOT updated their Email addresses, can you please do so. It is of importance that your Email is current, so as we can contact you if applicable . Send me the details in my Private Message Box.
Thank You Doc Vernon
-
26th March 2013, 07:01 PM
#41
Flume Tanks....

Originally Posted by
Tony Geeves
Didn't the Port Caroline and Charmers have some type of stabilising tank located in the crane housing foreward of the bridge? I think its efficiency was being monitered by the Nauticle something or other of Southampton. I understood that sea water went througe a narrowing, from one side to the other when the ship rolled, and supposedly damped down the effect. Regards, T.G.
They were called FLUME TANKS,and they were built into the DART AMERICA and DART ATLANTIC,which at the time in 1970 were the largest British cellular container ships built at that date.That ties in with the approximate year(68) for the Port ships.
I don't think the system was too successful,but maybe Capt.John Arton,who sailed in them after sale to CP ,and a few years after me,could expand on this answer?
Gulliver
-
27th March 2013, 05:43 AM
#42

Originally Posted by
Richard Quartermaine
..........
I bought this postcard there exactly 63 years ago. In the background is the bridge like in Sydney Harbour Bridge.
I well recall all of those places you mention, spent many a summer holiday in those area and loved it.


Happy daze John in Oz.
Life is too short to blend in.
John Strange R737787
World Traveller

-
27th March 2013, 05:47 AM
#43

Originally Posted by
Tony Geeves
Didn't the Port Caroline and Charmers have some type of stabilising tank located in the crane housing forward of the bridge? I think its efficiency was being monitered by the Nauticle something or other of Southampton. I understood that sea water went through a narrowing, from one side to the other when the ship rolled, and supposedly damped down the effect. Regards, T.G.
That process has been expanded on to the modern day cruise ships. There are wt very large tanks forard, when the ship has to make a turn water is moved from one to the other to keep the ship upright. I forgot just how much water each can hold but it runs into thousands of litres and is pumped at about 1000 liters per second. It acts much the same way as shockers do on a car when cornering.


Happy daze John in Oz.
Life is too short to blend in.
John Strange R737787
World Traveller

Similar Threads
-
By Trampshipman in forum Merchant Navy General Postings
Replies: 16
Last Post: 25th June 2010, 06:19 AM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules