By registering with our site you will have full instant access to:
268,000 posts on every subject imaginable contributed by 1000's of members worldwide.
25000 photos and videos mainly relating to the British Merchant Navy.
Members experienced in research to help you find out about friends and relatives who served.
The camaraderie of 1000's of ex Merchant Seamen who use the site for recreation & nostalgia.
Here we are all equal whether ex Deck Boy or Commodore of the Fleet.
A wealth of experience and expertise from all departments spanning 70+ years.
It is simple to register and membership is absolutely free.
N.B. If you are going to be requesting help from one of the forums with finding historical details of a relative
please include as much information as possible to help members assist you. We certainly need full names,
date and place of birth / death where possible plus any other details you have such as discharge book numbers etc.
Please post all questions onto the appropriate forum
-
29th September 2010, 12:07 PM
#11
King James.........
By searching the new Crew Lists,I find that one of our members COL GRACE served aboard the King James and the other bulker ,King William during the early 70's.He has recorded the Company as ....King Line.
Yes,I was also at sea in the 70's and I do know that these two bulkers had the Clan Line funnel(black with 2 red stripes-).
They might have been on charter,but I feel the parent company of Clan Line and King Line .i.e. British & Commonwealth owned them.
We need COL GRACE to come on line and tell us what company he was working for in 1973!
Anybody else served on the bulker King James.(built 1970)? Which company owned her?-do you have a discharge book entry-?does it show an Official No:?
Regards
Gulliver
Last edited by Gulliver; 29th September 2010 at 12:37 PM.
-
29th September 2010, 01:04 PM
#12
From a thread that has started on
http://www.shipsnostalgia.com/showth...hlight=lushman
it would appear that Peter Lushman may have also discharged himself from the “King James “ in view of the fact that his passport & possessions were found, the ships log if and when found would probably record the accident with the time and date, the fact of Peter being in hospital, and his discharge, if he didn’t rejoin the ship it I would also recorded that he failed to join the ship when due to sail,
if he discharged himself from hospital “ Later that Day” (which Day/ Date) then next seen “eating breakfast on the 12th November 1977” it is possible that he returned to the ship to collect his belongings and discharged, possibly with a view of engaging another ship in due course,
Ray
-
29th September 2010, 01:35 PM
#13
That's right,Ray..I advised Rebecka (my post # 8) on here- to post a thread on Ships Nostalgia as well-so she has done just that!
Let's hope she gets some replies...just imagine how any one of us would feel if we couldn't find out what happened to a serving MN member of our family.....
Regards
Gulliver
-
29th September 2010, 04:11 PM
#14
Lloyds register of British and Foreign shipping is issued every year and list all ships. The 1977 version will list the ship it lists all ships over 100 tonnes. It is a great tome red in colour. If the vessel has a Lloyds and IMO number it must be registered. It needed to be for international trading. The BOT registered vessels then.
Check you local reference libraries find out who has got a 1977 version, it lists them in type,tonnage and alphabet, its used a lot for insurance.
regards
jimmy
-
29th September 2010, 04:40 PM
#15
That is correct.....and I have mentioned before in a previous post on this thread ,the KING JAMES was called that right through from 1970 to 1978(when she became m.v.NUMBER FOUR).
Her IMO Number is 7011591
Regards
Gulliver
-
29th September 2010, 09:30 PM
#16
I am certain that the "King JAmes " was a King Line Bulk carrier , built in Spain in the 1970 I have tried looking on old records but all I can find is
King Line had 11 ships in 1956, when the Clan and Union-Castle groups merged and Cayzer. Irving & Co became managers of the combined fleet. This led to the co-ordination and rationalisation of the network, which had a considerable impact on King Line. Its conventional cargo ships were sold or transferred within the Group but were gradually replaced by bulk carriers. The bulk carrier fleet peaked at 6 vessels, owned from 1975 to 1978, when one was sold, but was replaced by two tankers that were operated by another group company, Scottish Tankers Ltd. These two ships were sold in 1982 and 1985. The Cayzer family sold their last ship a year later.
Rob Page R855150 - British & Commonwealth Shipping ( 1965 - 1973 ) Gulf Oil -( 1973 - 1975 ) Sealink ( 1975 - 1986 )
-
29th September 2010, 09:36 PM
#17
picture at
http://www.photoship.co.uk/JAlbum%20...0James-03.html
99% certain that is ex British & Commonwealth .
In answer to why was he left behind , I knew of a couple of occasiions where guys missed a ship because they were in hospital , and i understood they hitched a lift home as a DBS , distressed British Seafarer . I would guess that the embassy would have arranged that .
Rob Page R855150 - British & Commonwealth Shipping ( 1965 - 1973 ) Gulf Oil -( 1973 - 1975 ) Sealink ( 1975 - 1986 )
-
29th September 2010, 09:48 PM
#18
Mirimar!
Dont know if this is any help at all,but its from Mirimar Ship Index!
However still doesnt list which Company!?
Cheers
Single Ship Report for "7011591"IDNo: 7011591 Year: 1970
Name: KING JAMES Keel:
Type: Bulk carrier Launch Date: 21.2.70
Flag: GBR Date of completion: 10.70
Tons: 30289 Link: 1730
DWT: 56255 Yard No: 158
Length overall: 206.9 Ship Design:
LPP: 194.3 Country of build: ESP
Beam: 29.1 Builder: Espanoles
Material of build: Location of yard: Matagorda
Number of
screws/Mchy/
Speed(kn): 1D-17
Naval or paramilitary marking :
A: *
End: 1982
Subsequent History:
[L as ARALAR] - 78 NUMBER FOUR - 82 TYNE
Disposal Data:
BU La Spezia 24.9.82
Senior Site Moderator-Member and Friend of this Website
R697530
-
30th September 2010, 12:37 AM
#19
Vernon,
If you read all the previous postings, we have been down this line regarding Miramar and the lack of information regarding the company and also lack of an Official No.
If I get chance and no one else comes up with the information before hand, I will try and get to Middlesbrough Reference Library and see if they have copies of the Lloyd's Register for the years in question. My research as you know is WWI & II and I know they have copies on this period, so all I can do is ask.
"Across the seas where the great waves grow, there are no fields for the poppies to grow, but its a place where Seamen sleep, died for their country, for you and for peace" (Billy McGee 2011)
-
1st October 2010, 07:33 AM
#20
KING JAMES (2nd of name in B&C fleet) (1970 - 1978)
O.N. 339322. 30,289g. 20,462n. 678' 8" x 95' 4" x 43' 7"
6-cyl. 2 S.C.S.A. (900 x 1,550mm) Sulzer 6RND90 type oil engine made by the shipbuilder at Sestao Works, Bilbao. 15,000 BHP
21.2.1970: Launched as ARALAR by Astilleros Espanoles S. A., Matagorda, Cadiz (Yard No. 158) for Naviera Artola S. A., Spain.
7.9.1970: Sold to King Line Ltd., (Cayzer, Irvine & Company Ltd., managers) and renamed KING JAMES.
Rob Page R855150 - British & Commonwealth Shipping ( 1965 - 1973 ) Gulf Oil -( 1973 - 1975 ) Sealink ( 1975 - 1986 )
Similar Threads
-
By Craig Smith in forum Merchant Navy General Postings
Replies: 13
Last Post: 24th October 2014, 06:23 PM
-
By John Arton in forum Trivia and Interesting Stuff
Replies: 20
Last Post: 7th June 2014, 06:57 AM
-
By denniswalker in forum Shell Tankers
Replies: 5
Last Post: 30th January 2012, 05:53 PM
-
By denniswalker in forum Ben Line
Replies: 7
Last Post: 23rd November 2011, 08:11 AM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules