Re: Royal Navy " specifications " ?
In reply to happy daze john in oz, you can blame the EU. They made most of the British MN worth scrap value only when we joined the UE and have bled us dry so we could not build navy ships. This is their retribution for us winning the war and typical Frog and Kraut. The sooner England gets out of the EU the better, or it will end up as a small island off Europe and probably used as migrant camp by the bastards of Brussels.
Re: Royal Navy " specifications " ?
We were once GREAT BRITAIN,
now a small province of a Greater Germany.
Adolf must be spinning in his grave , saying, "Why didnt I think of that."
Re: Royal Navy " specifications " ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Colin Wood
In reply to happy daze john in oz, you can blame the EU. They made most of the British MN worth scrap value only when we joined the UE and have bled us dry so we could not build navy ships. This is their retribution for us winning the war and typical Frog and Kraut. The sooner England gets out of the EU the better, or it will end up as a small island off Europe and probably used as migrant camp by the bastards of Brussels.
Colin, from what I know of it the sooner out the better.
Good luck to Boris, think he will do it.
Re: Royal Navy " specifications " ?
The ( British ) " GREEN LIST " of worldwide landing ships, craft and barges corrected to June 5, 1944 has been posted to my website ( Mercantile Convoy CU 49 of 1944 by Mark C. Keever ). File 32D of 145 pages is indexed to show 5,504 vessels. To date, I've completed information on " Particulars ", PINK ( major warship ), RED ( minor warship ) and GREEN ( landing related ) lists for your informational purposes. Still, I think I'm lacking something and request your help. " AUXILIARY " vessels seem to be mentioned in dispatches. These consisted of what type of craft ? Do you think some kind of Admiralty lists were produced and held by the KEW ? Again, your thoughts are appreciated. THANK-YOU !