Vic no further comment for the sake of the site which is argument free at the moment.
Regards.
Jim.B.
Printable View
Vic no further comment for the sake of the site which is argument free at the moment.
Regards.
Jim.B.
Agreed.
Vic
One thing i promise guys, Christopher Chose is out of work next election, i saw a program where they were interviewing the public in Christchurch, he's gone !!! kt
Always some prat ready to object just for the hell of it is there not. What I can not understand is photos taken from under the skirt is? How do they identify the person who for a start did not know that they had it taken or is there some identifying mark on women that I have missed out in my life LOL. The other thing is how does one know that it was not consensual between photo taker and poser. Can just imagine the lawyers argueing that one in court. Mind you I bet there are plenty out there that are best not photographed hey LOL.
Though a serious topic, does remind me of school.
Knock Knock
Who's there?
Nicholas
Nicholas who?
Nicholas girls shouldn't climb trees!
Never had a camera then and certain
I could have found prettier views if I
had.
LOL.
K.
Be curious to see how the courts would view a case of GBH if the Pervert taking the photo up skirting and the woman concerned husband actually caught the guy in the act. Soft courts these days would award pervert criminal damages.
Lew, If i catch anyone doing this for cheap thrills and embarrassment to the woman, It wont only be his mobile phone that gets the weight of my foot, As for Mr chose........................ A few years ago this sort of thing could have brought a government down Terry.